Asian Spine J > Volume 16(6); 2022 > Article |
|
Conflict of Interest
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Author Contributions
All authors contributed to the intellectual development of this paper; HRB and YH conceived and planned the study; BKB and FN performed the systematic literature search; BKB and FN wrote the manuscript; BKB, FN, YH, and HRB contributed to the interpretation of the results and provided critical feedback to the manuscript; and the final version of the paper has been seen and approved by all authors.
Study | Clearly stated aim | Inclusion of consecutive patients | Prospective collection of data | Endpoints appropriate to aim of study | Unbiased assessment of study endpoint | Adequate FU period | Loss to FU <5% | Prospective calculation of study size | Additional criteria for comparative studies | Total score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adequate control group | Contemporary groups | Baseline equivalence of groups | Adequate statistical analysis | ||||||||||
Akeda et al. [22] (2015) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | - | 15/16 |
Garnero et al. [20] (2004) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | - | 16/16 |
Hashimoto et al. [23] (2019) | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | - | 10/16 |
Hassett et al. [21] (2006) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | - | 15/16 |
Horváth et al. [16] (2009) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | 13/16 |
Kim et al. [17] (2008) | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 19/24 |
Riyazi et al. [18] (2008) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 19/24 |
Shimizu et al. [24] (2020) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | - | 16/16 |
Yoshimura et al. [19] (2009) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | - | - | - | - | 12/16 |
Study | Country | Study design | No. of Subjects | Female (%) | Mean age (yr) | Mean BMI | Definition of KOA | Definition of LS | OR of KOA in LS patients (95% CI) | OR of LS in KOA patients (95% CI) | Covariates adjusted for |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Akeda et al. [22] (2015) | Japan | Retrospective cohort | 197 | 68.5 | 70.1 | 23.2 | Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥2 | NA | NR | NR | NA |
Garnero et al. [20] (2004) | France | Cross-sectional | 324 | 100.0 | 70.0 | NR | Joint Space Narrowing grade ≥2 | Joint Space Narrowing grade ≥2 | 1.61 (0.82–3.17) | 1.61 (0.82–3.17) | None |
Hashimoto et al. [23] (2019) | Japan | Retrospective cohort | 101 | 64.4 | 56.4 | NR | Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥2 | NA | NR | NR | NA |
Hassett et al. [21] (2006) | UK | Prospective cohort | 914 | 100.0 | 54.1 | 25.6 | Joint Space Narrowing grade ≥2 | Joint Space Narrowing grade ≥2 | 1.13 (0.79–1.62) | 1.13 (0.79–1.62) | Age, BMI |
Horváth et al. [16] (2009) | Hungary | Cross-sectional | 608 | 44.9 | 42.1 | 27.8 | Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥2 | Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥2 | 2.43 (1.56–3.79) | 2.43 (1.56–3.79) | None |
Kim et al. [17] (2008) | South Korea | Cross-sectional | 134 | 100.0 | 67.6 | 24.3 | Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥2 | Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥2 | 1.29 (0.64–2.61) | NA | Age, weight, BMI, menopausal age |
Riyazi et al. [18] (2008) | The Netherlands | Cross-sectional | 382 | 81.7 | 60.0 | 26 | Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥2 | Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥2 | 1.04 (0.61–1.76) | 1.04 (0.61–1.76) | None |
Shimizu et al. [24] (2020) | Japan | Prospective cohort | 58 | 100.0 | 47.4 | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NA |
Yoshimura et al. [19] (2009) | Japan | Prospective cohort | 3,040 | 65.1 | 70.28 | 23.0 | Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥2 | Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥2 | 2.15 (1.83–2.52) | 2.15 (1.83–2.52) | None |
Endoscopic Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2023 December;17(6)