3. Kwan KY, Cheung AK, Koh HY, Cheung KM. Brace effectiveness is related to 3-dimensional plane parameters in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2021;103:37–43.
5. Richards BS, Bernstein RM, D’Amato CR, Thompson GH. Standardization of criteria for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis brace studies: SRS Committee on Bracing and Nonoperative Management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:2068–77.
7. Helenius L, Diarbakerli E, Grauers A, et al. Back pain and quality of life after surgical treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at 5-year follow-up: comparison with healthy controls and patients with untreated idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019;101:1460–6.
8. Mens RH, Bisseling P, de Kleuver M, van Hooff ML. Relevant impact of surgery on quality of life for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a registry-based two-year follow-up cohort study. Bone Joint J 2022;104–B:265–73.
10. Negrini S, Negrini F, Fusco C, Zaina F. Idiopathic scoliosis patients with curves more than 45 Cobb degrees refusing surgery can be effectively treated through bracing with curve improvements. Spine J 2011;11:369–80.
12. Zhu Z, Xu L, Jiang L, et al. Is brace treatment appropriate for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients refusing surgery with cobb angle between 40 and 50 degrees. Clin Spine Surg 2017;30:85–9.
13. Lusini M, Donzelli S, Minnella S, Zaina F, Negrini S. Brace treatment is effective in idiopathic scoliosis over 45°: an observational prospective cohort controlled study. Spine J 2014;14:1951–6.
14. Aulisa AG, Guzzanti V, Falciglia F, Giordano M, Galli M, Aulisa L. Brace treatment of idiopathic scoliosis is effective for a curve over 40 degrees, but is the evaluation of Cobb angle the only parameter for the indication of treatment? Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2019;55:231–40.
21. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002;21:1539–58.
22. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994;50:1088–101.
25. Xu L, Yang X, Wang Y, et al. Brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with curve between 40° and 45°: effectiveness and related factors. World Neurosurg 2019;126:e901–6.
26. Hawary RE, Zaaroor-Regev D, Floman Y, Lonner BS, Alkhalife YI, Betz RR. Brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: risk factors for failure: a literature review. Spine J 2019;19:1917–25.
29. Sanders JO, Khoury JG, Kishan S, et al. Predicting scoliosis progression from skeletal maturity: a simplified classification during adolescence. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:540–53.
30. Rahimi S, Kiaghadi A, Fallahian N. Effective factors on brace compliance in idiopathic scoliosis: a literature review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2020;15:917–23.
31. Kawasaki S, Shigematsu H, Tanaka M, Suga Y, Yamamoto Y, Tanaka Y. Is brace treatment unnecessary for cases of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis above Risser sign 3? J Orthop Sci 2020;25:975–9.