Materials and Methods
We reviewed 50 consecutive adult patients (who fit the inclusion criteria) treated in our clinic for spinal cord compression due to tuberculous spondylitis, between May 1993 and July 2002. This was a prospective study, with all enrolled patients being given a fixed non-surgical management protocol. There was no 'control' group, as all patients who suited the inclusion criteria were offered the same protocol of management.
1. Inclusion criterias
- Clinico-radiological diagnosis of spinal TB
- Documented cord compression on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, in the form of soft tissue effacement of the spinal cord or the conus medullaris, with complete obliteration of the thecal sac at that level
- With or without associated clinical evidence of spinal cord compression
All of these patients were not biopsy proven cases, as they belonged to the period when we did not perform biopsy routinely in all cases and empirical treatment was often followed.
2. Exclusion criterias
- Lesions below the conus level
- Presence of bony compression
- Severe or progressive neurological deficit of Frankel grade C
- Children below the age of maturity
There were 32 females and 18 males. The age ranged from 17 years to 86 years with an average age of 42 years. The average duration of follow-up was 20 months (range, 12-72 months). Seven of the 50 patients had pure cervical spine lesions, while the other 43 had thoracic spine involvement (including cervico-thoracic and thoraco-lumbar lesions).
On presentation, all patients were admitted to hospital and each patient was evaluated clinically every day. Baseline plain X-rays of the spine and the chest, routine blood checks and an MRI of the spine (if not already done) were done on admission.
All patients were treated with a pre-set, methodically applied conservative treatment with empirical AKT, under very close supervision. At this point in our practice, it was standard practice to treat TB empirically (as TB was an endemic disease in our country and standard diagnostic techniques like computed tomography [CT] guided biopsy and modern culture and sensitivity methods were not available). This included, anti-TB medications ([isoniazide 5 mg/kg, rifampicine 10 mg/kg, ethambutol 15 mg/kg, and pyrazinamide 25 mg/kg] as first line medication), IV methyl-prednisolone and a regular time-bound clinico-radiological follow-up. Patients with no clinical or laboratory response at 3 months were considered to be resistant to first line AKT and were put on second line medications (kanamycin, ciprofloxacin, sparfloxacin, ethionamide and so forth). The treatment of patients with resistance to first line AKT consisted of using at least three second line drugs of which one was an injectable. At the time of this study, the total duration of our standard empirical treatment was 12 months.
The treatment was monitored and supervised by the chest physicians throughout. Patients were evaluated clinically, as well as by radiology, and blood investigation reports were analyzed for inflammatory markers at presentation by a single observer. Total blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, liver function tests and serum uric acid were done to monitor the response to medications as well as the side effects. Healing was judged clinically as well as radiologically as follows.
Clinically, improvement was defined as a significant improvement in spinal pain/tenderness, paraspinal muscle spasm and eventual predisease activity status with weight gain and no residual instability or neurological deficits. On MRI scan, all the patients had presented with an epidural abscess compressing the spinal cord. Radiologically, improvement was defined as significant regression in the epidural abscess/granulation tissue in the immediate follow-up period and marrow reconversion and fatty reconstitution of the diseased bone at the final follow-up. An MRI scan was done at 0, 3, and 12 months to monitor the radiological response to treatment, i.e., resolution of the epidural soft tissue and pus compressing the spinal cord. Follow-up in the series ranged from one to five years, with the average follow-up being 2 years.
All patients were not only informed about the nature and duration of treatment they were to undergo but also the importance of a strict follow-up program, and the warning signs and the possibility of eventual surgery.
Results
The results of our pre-set, methodically applied, conservative treatment under very close observation were as follows. At the time of presentation, 10 patients had a motor deficit of Frankel grade D, 18 patients had clinically detectable hyper-reflexia, while the other 22 patients had normal neurology (Frankel grade E). Seven patients had been advised to have surgery elsewhere and they were admitted for the same. Four patients required more than 4-drug (first line) AKT based on the clinico-radiological criteria and response to first line AKT. Of these, one of the patients was a culture/biopsy proven drug-resistant TB patient.
On MRI scan, all the patients presented with an epidural abscess compressing the spinal cord. Forty-seven out of 50 patients responded completely to non-operative treatment and healed with no residual neurological (Frankel grade E) deficit. Three patients worsened neurologically to Frankel grade C while on AKT, and hence, they were operated upon with excellent eventual recovery, progressing to normal neurology (Frankel grade E) in the immediate postoperative period, as well as at the final follow-up.
Discussion
With the description of the anterior approach in the 1970s, and subsequently, with the technical revolution in spinal reconstruction and instrumentation, spinal TB was being treated increasingly with surgery till the mid 1990s [
17]. The surgical options ranged from simple drainage of pus to radical resection of the tuberculous infected focus/affected vertebra, followed by reconstruction using bone grafts, cages and stabilization with implants.
However, the treatment of spinal TB seems to have come full circle today, with a better understanding of the microbiology of the disease, as well as the better availability of modern culture and sensitivity methods. Spinal TB today is considered a medical disease in the absence of neurological deficit and gross deformity [
18,
19,
20].
However, there are no clear cut guidelines in the literature regarding how much neurology is significant to warrant surgery. It is obviously difficult to set a cut off point for neurologic deficits, for the movement from nonsurgical to surgical treatment. In the literature, guidelines vary from offering surgery to patients with any grade of neurologic deficit to performing surgery only for patients with advanced motor deficits. Patients with significant neurologic deficits, i.e., TB paraplegia with epidural pus and granulation tissue compressing the spinal cord (on an MRI scan), have straight forward indications for surgery [
21], as the prognosis of recovery is better when compared to other pathological compressive lesions. But in the TB spine, most of the times the disease is evolving, i.e., the development of a neurologic deficit is a gradual process with a set pattern. Hence, there remain a large subgroup of spinal TB patients with radiologic epidural cord compression but with only early neurological signs, i.e., with clumsy gait, hyper-reflexia, clonus and early motor deficits (Frankel grade D and E). It is in this group of patients that a trial of conservative treatment can be considered. In our current study, 47 out of 50 such patients responded well to non-surgical treatment and did not end up with progressive neurological worsening, clearly showing that radiological evidence of cord compression and early neurologic signs need not be an absolute indication for surgery in the management of spinal TB.
There always remains a chance of failure, as well as the fear of a worsening neurologic deficit while on conservative treatment, for which close monitoring of the patient's neurological status is extremely important. For this we did (and do advocate) initial monitoring of these patients as inpatients, with twice daily complete neurological examinations to check for the slightest possible deterioration in motor power. The same regimen is continued for two weeks once the patient's condition stabilizes. Patient education and counseling about the red flags and the possibility of emergent surgery while on treatment remain of paramount importance.
Any worsening in motor power or persistence of the preexisting neurologic status despite the patient being on AKT and the above mentioned supportive treatment calls for a decision to be made regarding surgical treatment. A worsening neurologic deficit or the development of a major neurologic deficit (≤Frankel grade C) or progressive paraplegia while on treatment under supervision becomes an absolute indication for surgical treatment. Epidural soft tissue swelling consisting of pus, granulation tissue and edema may subside and resolve completely with antitubercular medicines alone as shown in
Figs. 1,
2,
3. Forty-seven out of fifty (94%) patients in our series showed complete resorption and healing of the compressing epidural tissue with chemotherapy alone. In three patients (6%), further worsening of the neurologic deficit (≤than Frankel grade C) despite chemotherapy made us consider surgical decompression (
Fig. 4). In these operated patients, the neurologic status improved completely to normal in the immediate postoperative period, which persisted even after stopping the AKT, at the final follow-up.
In the long term follow-up, conservatively treated TB spine patients developing a kyphotic deformity and its sequelae, i.e., instability (due to concertina collapse in central body lesions) remain a possible entity [
22,
23], but as substantially evident now, this possibility becomes relevant only in the growing spine [
24,
25], and the advantages of conservative treatment abundantly outweigh surgical treatment as shown in the literature [
26]. In this series, we had six patients with vertebral collapse due to a central body lesion, of which four patients presented with instability complaints at the start of treatment. These complaints resolved completely with time, after treatment with proper AKT.
The issue of drug resistance is very important while treating spinal TB patients [
27], as the incidence of drug-resistant TB is on rise [
28]. Hence, tissue diagnosis and rapid
in vitro culture and sensitivity testing methods such as the automated BACTEC Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube 960 TB system gain importance [
29]. CT guided biopsies increase the accuracy of needle placement, and hence, also the results [
30]. In the event of equivocal results of these tests, one can treat spinal TB patients based on the clinico-radiological grounds.
Of importance is patient education and active participation. The patient's views which may include a preference for non-surgical treatment should be given due consideration in the presence of spinal cord compression, which otherwise is thought as a surgical problem. The intricate details of the non-operative treatment should be explained to the patient as well as the pros and cons of both types of treatment.
1. Limitations of the study
This was a short series of only 50 patients. A larger study group may be required for a more definite conclusion. At the time of this study, the hospital had not adopted biopsy followed by culture and sensitivity testing as a routine policy for each patient before starting AKT. Hence, we really do not know how many of these patients were multi-drug-resistant TB patients and whether their TB would have behaved the same as mycobacterial TB following treatment. A strict follow-up is a must in this kind of study so that worsening neurology can be diagnosed early in order for surgery to be offered at the earliest opportunity. The follow-up MRI scans at 0, 3, 6 months and before completion of the AKT can be a logistical problem in the case of patients in developing countries. Last but not least, the assessment of neurologic deficits is observer-dependent; hence, inter-observer variability in the assessment of neurologic deficits may lead to the wrong treatment.