1. Yuan HA, Garfin SR, Dickman CA, Mardjetko SM. A historical cohort study of pedicle screw fixation in thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spinal fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994;19:2279S–2296S. PMID:
7817243.
2. Kornblum MB, Fischgrund JS, Herkowitz HN, Abraham DA, Berkower DL, Ditkoff JS. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective long-term study comparing fusion and pseudarthrosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:726–733. PMID:
15087793.
4. Fischer CR, Cassilly R, Cantor W, Edusei E, Hammouri Q, Errico T. A systematic review of comparative studies on bone graft alternatives for common spine fusion procedures. Eur Spine J 2013;22:1423–1435. PMID:
23440339.
5. Younger EM, Chapman MW. Morbidity at bone graft donor sites. J Orthop Trauma 1989;3:192–195. PMID:
2809818.
6. Laurie SW, Kaban LB, Mulliken JB, Murray JE. Donor-site morbidity after harvesting rib and iliac bone. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984;73:933–938. PMID:
6374708.
7. Giannoudis PV, Dinopoulos H, Tsiridis E. Bone substitutes: an update. Injury 2005;36(Suppl 3): S20–S27. PMID:
16188545.
8. Vaccaro AR, Chiba K, Heller JG, et al. Bone grafting alternatives in spinal surgery. Spine J 2002;2:206–215. PMID:
14589495.
9. Zimmermann G, Moghaddam A. Allograft bone matrix versus synthetic bone graft substitutes. Injury 2011;42(Suppl 2): S16–S21. PMID:
21889142.
10. Benglis DM, Boden SD, Wang MY,Biology of spine fusion. Benzel EC, editors. Spine surgery: techniques, complication avoidance, and management. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2012. p.145–154.
11. Yi J, Lee GW, Nam WD, et al. A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing bone union rate following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using a polyetheretherketone cage: hydroxyapatite/Btricalcium phosphate mixture versus hydroxyapatite/demineralized bone matrix mixture. Asian Spine J 2015;9:30–38. PMID:
25705332.
12. Lee KJ, Roper JG, Wang JC. Demineralized bone matrix and spinal arthrodesis. Spine J 2005;5(6 Suppl): 217S–223S. PMID:
16291116.
13. Fischgrund JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz HN, Brower R, Montgomery DM, Kurz LT. 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies: degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997;22:2807–2812. PMID:
9431616.
14. Hsu WK, Nickoli MS, Wang JC, et al. Improving the clinical evidence of bone graft substitute technology in lumbar spine surgery. Global Spine J 2012;2:239–248. PMID:
24353975.
15. Sengupta DK, Truumees E, Patel CK, et al. Outcome of local bone versus autogenous iliac crest bone graft in the instrumented posterolateral fusion of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:985–991. PMID:
16641774.
16. Ohtori S, Koshi T, Suzuki M, et al. Uni- and bilateral instrumented posterolateral fusion of the lumbar spine with local bone grafting: a prospective study with a 2-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:E1744–E1748. PMID:
21544013.
17. Inage K, Ohtori S, Koshi T, et al. One, two-, and three-level instrumented posterolateral fusion of the lumbar spine with a local bone graft: a prospective study with a 2-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:1392–1396. PMID:
21224776.
18. Kwon B, Jenis LG. Carrier materials for spinal fusion. Spine J 2005;5(6 Suppl): 224S–230S. PMID:
16291117.
19. Martin GJ Jr, Boden SD, Titus L, Scarborough NL. New formulations of demineralized bone matrix as a more effective graft alternative in experimental posterolateral lumbar spine arthrodesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:637–645. PMID:
10209791.
20. Cook SD, Dalton JE, Prewett AB, Whitecloud TS 3rd. In vivo evaluation of demineralized bone matrix as a bone graft substitute for posterior spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:877–886. PMID:
7644952.
21. Morone MA, Boden SD. Experimental posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion with a demineralized bone matrix gel. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998;23:159–167. PMID:
9474720.
22. Cammisa FP Jr, Lowery G, Garfin SR, et al. Two-year fusion rate equivalency between Grafton DBM gel and autograft in posterolateral spine fusion: a prospective controlled trial employing a side-by-side comparison in the same patient. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:660–666. PMID:
15014276.
23. Ransford AO, Morley T, Edgar MA, et al. Synthetic porous ceramic compared with autograft in scoliosis surgery. A prospective, randomized study of 341 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998;80:13–18. PMID:
9460945.
24. Thalgott JS, Fritts K, Giuffre JM, Timlin M. Anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine with coralline hydroxyapatite. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:1295–1299. PMID:
10404570.
25. Acharya NK, Kumar RJ, Varma HK, Menon VK. Hydroxyapatite-bioactive glass ceramic composite as stand-alone graft substitute for posterolateral fusion of lumbar spine: a prospective, matched, and controlled study. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008;21:106–111. PMID:
18391714.
26. Boden SD, Martin GJ Jr, Morone M, Ugbo JL, Titus L, Hutton WC. The use of coralline hydroxyapatite with bone marrow, autogenous bone graft, or osteoinductive bone protein extract for posterolateral lumbar spine fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:320–327. PMID:
10065514.
27. Fujibayashi S, Shikata J, Tanaka C, Matsushita M, Nakamura T. Lumbar posterolateral fusion with biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic. J Spinal Disord 2001;14:214–221. PMID:
11389371.
28. Kurd M, Cohick S, Park A, Ahmadinia K, Lee J, An H. Fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison of osteoconductive and osteoinductive bone graft substitutes. Eur Spine J 2015;24:1066–1073. PMID:
25371089.
29. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance document for the preparation of IDEs for spinal systems. Rockville: Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health; 2000.