Dystrophinopathy in the paravertebral muscle of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective case-control study in China

Article information

Asian Spine J. 2025;19(1):64-73
Publication date (electronic) : 2025 February 4
doi : https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2024.0299
1Orthopaedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
2Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Beijing, China
3Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Beijing, China
4Department of Pathology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China
5Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China
6Departmant of Neurology, Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
Corresponding author: Miao Yu, Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China, Tel: +86-82267368, Fax: +86-10-82267368, E-mail: miltonyupku@163.com
*These authors contributed equally to this work as the first authors.
Received 2024 August 6; Revised 2024 November 9; Accepted 2024 November 11.

Abstract

Study Design

A prospective case-control study.

Purpose

This prospective case-control study aimed to analyze the paravertebral muscle changes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and determine paravertebral myopathological changes associated with the clinical progression of AIS.

Overview of Literature

The incidence of AIS is significant globally and worsens before bone maturation, causing a serious effect. Many studies have investigated its causes—such as genetic, epigenetic, and hormonal factors—but more research remains warranted.

Methods

This study enrolled 40 patients with AIS, 20 patients with congenital scoliosis (CS), and 20 patients with spinal degenerative disease (SDD). All patients underwent open posterior surgery in our hospital, and a paravertebral muscle (multifidus muscle) biopsy was performed intraoperatively. This study included many indexes that describe muscle, especially dystrophin staining. The above pathological results were compared among the AIS, CS, and SDD groups. The correlation between the Cobb angle and Nash–Moe classification and the above pathological results was analyzed in patients with AIS.

Results

Significant reductions in the dystrophin staining of dystrophin-1 (p<0.001), dystrophin-2 (p<0.001), and dystrophin-3 (p<0.001) were observed in the AIS group than in the CS and SDD groups. The higher the Nash–Moe classification in the AIS group, the more significant the loss of dystrophin-2 (p=0.042) in the convex paraspinal muscles. Additionally, a significantly positive correlation was observed between the reductions of dystrophin-2 on the concave side of the AIS group and Cobb angle (p=0.011).

Conclusions

Dystrophin protein deficiency in the paraspinal muscles plays a crucial role in AIS formation and progression. The severity of scoliosis in patients with AIS is correlated with the extent of dystrophin loss in the paravertebral muscles. Therefore, dystrophin dysfunction may be relevant to AIS occurrence and development.

Introduction

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a disease characterized by vertebral rotation and lateral curvature of the spine that impairs physical growth during adolescence [1]. It affects 2%–4% of children aged <16 years globally, frequently beginning mildly in early adolescence and worsening as skeletal maturity approaches, with 0.04%–0.3% of adolescents developing severe AIS with curves of >40° [2,3]. The etiology of AIS has been investigated through genetic, epigenetic, endocrine, and developmental factors, but it remains largely unknown [35].

Several researchers evaluated the proportion and quantity of types I and II skeletal muscle fibers in AIS in the mid-1970s and revealed that paraspinal muscular imbalance was one of the main hallmarks of AIS [6,7]. Ultrastructural assessment of the multifidus muscle in progressive idiopathic scoliosis in the 1980s indicated sarcolemma and myotendinous junction changes [8]. AIS is predominantly associated with paraspinal nerve or muscle pathology changes according to previous studies [9]. In 2015, Luciano et al. [10] presented cases of patients with AIS who did not demonstrate the typical symptoms of reduced limb muscle strength or restricted respiratory muscle function. However, paraspinal muscle biopsies from two of these patients with AIS indicated a high likelihood of core myopathy. Hypothetically, this is because AIS may be a particular kind of neuromuscular disease [10,11]. Moreover, neuromuscular illnesses, such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), which has dystrophin protein deficit in the muscles, impair the paraspinal muscles and induce scoliosis in late stage [12]. Additionally, abnormal expression of plasma proteins, such as recombinant vitamin D binding protein, has altered AIS pathogenesis [13]. Both of these observations indicate that the proteins in the paraspinal muscles affect spinal morphology. Therefore, further etiological studies are warranted to identify whether specific neuromuscular diseases are related to AIS. Paraspinal myopathy may be a key factor in the initial pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis [9].

We conducted a prospective case-control study based on the hypothesis that AIS onset and progression may be related to neuromuscular diseases and protein abnormalities using histological methods and immunohistochemical markers to assess the pathological changes in the paraspinal muscles and their correlation with the severity of the spinal deformity.

Materials and Methods

Patients

This prospective case-control study began in November 2018 at Peking University Third Hospital (registration number: ChiCTR2100048484). This study was approved by Ethics Committee of Peking University Third Hospital (no., M2019488). Informed consent forms for surgery were obtained from all the patients or their legal surrogates. The authors affirm that this manuscript did not contain any individual person’s data or images which need to provide informed consent for publication. The case series included 40 patients with AIS, all of whom underwent posterior scoliosis correction surgery. Their average age was 16.51±5.20 years (Table 1). The inclusion criteria were as follows: being an adolescent aged 8–19 years, previously diagnosed with AIS by a physician, having a normal body mass index (18.5–23.9 kg/m2), and having no related complications. All participants had main thoracic/lumbar curves with a Cobb angle of >40° by the standing posteroanterior radiographs, Risser sign of ≥3°, and met the surgical indications. This study excluded neurological, muscular, neuromuscular, and rheumatologic illnesses, malignancies, and surgical correction histories. None of the patients in this series underwent preoperative physiotherapy or wore braces. Additionally, the patients were separated into mild (Nash–Moe 0 and I) and severe (Nash–Moe II and III) Nash–Moe groups to identify if dystrophin protein deficiency increased with vertebral rotation. Controls were 20 patients with CS and 20 with SDD.

Clinical features of the patients

Pathological sampling and specimen preparation

The experienced surgeon performed a paraspinal muscle biopsy of the multifidus muscle in both the concave and convex regions. Performing the biopsy slightly away from the tendon tissue is important to prevent nonspecific pathological changes. The biopsy specimen was wrapped in semihumid saline gauze and immediately transported to the laboratory. In the laboratory, the tissue was drained with blotting paper, embedded in tragacanth and OCT compound (Tissue-Tek), and then rapidly frozen in isopentane precooled in liquid nitrogen. This meticulous procedure prevents autolytic changes or irreversible artifacts in the muscle tissue within 30 minutes. Cryostat sections were cut to a 7–10 μm thickness. Conventional hematoxylin and eosin staining, histochemical staining (NADH-TR), and EnVision two-step immunohistochemical staining were conducted under standard techniques that utilized the following primary antibodies: dystrophin-1 (anti-dystrophin rod domain; Leica Biosystems, Deer Park, IL, USA), -2 (anti-dystrophin C-terminal; Leica Biosystems), -3 (anti-dystrophin N-terminal; Leica Biosystems), and myosin (Zsbio, Beijing, China) [14]. We utilized polyclonal antibodies to stain dystrophin and used normal tissue from a cadaver as a control to confirm the antibody specificity. Our results are consistent across multiple measurements, minimizing the potential for sampling errors.

Interpretation of the pathological results

The following items were observed and assessed: (1) muscle atrophy, compensatory hypertrophy, and muscle degeneration degrees; (2) whorled fibers or internal nuclei presence; (3) muscle fiber type proportion and distribution; (4) muscle tissue interstitial condition, and (5) dystrophin expression. No generally recognized standard exists for grading these pathological features. Therefore, we used the predominant quartering method in pathology, which is also a customary approach, to conduct statistical processing. We refer to Sang-Jun’s method [15] to classify dystrophin staining into four levels, namely positive, uneven dyeing or dizzy lineation, light-colored lineation or discontinuous lineation, and negative. Additionally, other features refer to “Robbins basic pathology [16]” and “Muscle biopsy: a practical approach [14],” Two pathologists independently analyzed each subject, with no inconsistent judgments. The pathological results were compared between different patient groups and Nash–Moe classification in AIS. Correlation analysis was conducted between the pathological results and the Cobb angle in patients with AIS.

Statistical analysis

The IBM SPSS ver. 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for clinical and pathological data analyses. Descriptive statistics were expressed as mean with standard deviation and count data were presented in numbers. All p-values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant. The independent t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were conducted to analyze the differences in continuous variables between the groups. Fisher’s exact test and χ2 analyses were utilized to assess the differences among the categorical variables. The Cobb angle and dystrophin protein depletion were investigated based on Spearman correlation analysis with IBM SPSS.

Results

Clinical data of the enrolled patients

The AIS cohort consisted of 13 male and 27 female patients, with average ages of 16.5±5.20 years and Cobb angle of 54.84°±12.67°. Based on the Nash–Moe type classification, 7, 23, and 10 patients were classified as types I, II, and III, respectively. Additionally, we included 20 patients with SDD (including lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative thoracolumbar kyphosis) and 20 patients with CS (Table 1).

The histological changes of the paraspinal muscles and comparisons between the AIS and CS groups

Patients with AIS demonstrated less diffuse and small-group atrophy and a greater degree of large-group atrophy than those with CS (p=0.008) (Table 2), and the percentage of muscle atrophy was more severe (p=0.019) (Table 2). The degree of degeneration (p=0.067) (Table 2) in patients with AIS and the degree of edema was more severe (p=0.028) (Table 2). Most importantly, dystrophin-1, -2, and -3 were more decreased or absent in this group (p<0.001) (Table 2, Fig. 1).

Pathological features of muscle biopsy in AIS patients and CS groups

Fig. 1

The subtypes of dystrophin immunostaining pattern of the concave side muscle from adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) (A–C), congenital scoliosis (CS) (D–F), and spinal degenerative disease (SDD) (G–I) groups, respectively. (A–C) The immunostaining of dystrophin-1, -2, and -3 of AIS showed the expression of dystrophin protein decreased variously (immunohistochemistry [IHC], ×10). (D–F) The immunostaining of dystrophin-1, -2, and -3 of CS showed no missing expression (IHC, ×20). (G–I) The immunostaining of dystrophin-1, -2, and -3 of SDD showed no missing expression. The immunostaining of dystrophin showed no missing expression of the residual muscle fibers (red arrow) (IHC, ×20).

The histological changes of the paraspinal muscles and comparisons between the AIS and SDD groups

Patients with AIS had significantly less muscle atrophy than those with SDD (p=0.001) (Table 3), but significantly more degeneration (p=0.002) (Table 3) and edema (p<0.001) (Table 3). Additionally, the myofiber atrophic pattern of patients with AIS was mainly type II (p=0.020) (Table 3). Moreover, dystrophin-1, -2, and -3 were more decreased or absent in this group (p<0.001) (Table 3, Fig. 1).

Pathological features of muscle biopsy in AIS patients and SDD groups

Pathological features of the muscle biopsy of patients with AIS in different Nash–Moe subgroups

Only dystrophin protein expression differed statistically among the Nash–Moe subgroups in the muscle samples of patients with AIS. Immunostaining revealed that dystrophin-2 expression on the convex side was more abnormal or absent in the higher group types (p=0.042) (Table 4, Fig. 2).

Pathological features of muscle biopsy in AIS patients in different Nash–Moe subgroups

Fig. 2

The dystrophin-2 staining pattern of the convex side muscle from adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in different Nash–Moe (NM) subgroups. (A) Dystrophin-2 immunostaining showed light-colored lineation or discontinuous lineation of the higher NM group (immunohistochemistry [IHC], ×20). (B) Dystrophin-2 immunostaining showed no missing expression or dizzy lineation of the lower NM group (IHC, ×20).

Correlation analysis between the Cobb angle and dystrophin

The pattern of dystrophin-2 staining on the concave side demonstrated a positive correlation with the Cobb angle (p=0.011) (Table 5), indicating that dystrophin-2 staining reduction at this site was associated with an increase in the Cobb angle (Fig. 3).

Correlation analysis between Cobb angle and dystrophin protein

Fig. 3

The dystrophin-2 staining pattern of the concave side muscle from adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients from different Cobb angle patients. (A) Dystrophin-2 immunostaining showed a few dizzy lineation or discontinuous lineation of Cobb 40.3° patient (IHC, ×20). (B) Dystrophin-2 immunostaining showed light-colored lineation of Cobb 46.2° patient (IHC, ×20). (C) Dystrophin-2 immunostaining showed staining loss of cobb 52.1° patient (IHC, ×20).

Discussion

AIS is a prevalent three-dimensional spine deformity characterized by a lateral spinal curvature of >10° [2]. The exact causes of scoliosis are unclear, but genetic, structural, and environmental factors may contribute to its development. The curvature of scoliosis frequently worsens during puberty, a time when the paraspinal muscles are rapidly growing [17]. Rehabilitation exercises for the paraspinal muscles, such as Schroth gymnastics, are effective in treating scoliosis [18]. Additionally, scoliosis frequently appears in the late stages of neuromuscular diseases and worsens with sagittal deformities [19]. Research on the association between paraspinal muscle lesions and scoliosis could provide new insights into the disease’s pathogenesis, with muscle biopsy being the most effective method for such studies [20].

Paraspinal muscle atrophy and degeneration

The patients with AIS in this study demonstrated higher paraspinal atrophy and atrophy incidence than those previously reported by Wajchenberg et al. [9]. Further, we indicate that the sampling location may affect atrophy, in addition to the disease course and the Cobb angle. This study sampled the paraspinal muscle closer to the tendon than before investigations, which may explain the increased atrophy rate [9].

Compared to patients with CS, those with AIS had a large group of atrophy, indicating that AIS may be a unique neuromuscular disease since neuromuscular disease muscle atrophy is mostly spread along the diseased nerve. Patients with AIS had a larger percentage of muscular atrophy than those with CS, possibly because their muscle atrophy was mostly in the big bundles. Moreover, muscular atrophy may play a role in AIS development.

Patients with AIS were significantly more severe in terms of the degree of edema, indicating that patients with AIS had severe lesions.

We studied 20 patients with SDD to understand muscle’s role in AIS’s pathogenesis. Patients with SDD had more muscle atrophy due to their longer clinical course, and those with AIS demonstrated more severe paraspinal muscle degeneration, indicating more serious myogenic lesions. This indicates that the muscles of patients with SDD have age-related changes, whereas patients with AIS demonstrated pathological degeneration.

Patients with AIS are generally young; hence, they have more type II muscle fibers, also known as “rapid muscle fibers” responsible for movement [21], than those with SDD. Spinal movement is restricted due to deformities, causing more atrophy of type II muscle fibers in AIS.

Abnormal expression of dystrophin in the paraspinal muscles of AIS

We are particularly interested in the dystrophin. The C-terminal of dystrophin-2 is key for connecting to the extracellular structure by relating two cytoplasmic proteins [22] which significantly affects muscle morphology and function in dystrophin-1, -2, and -3.

Dystrophin is a 427-kD structural protein and a cytoplasmic protein associated with sarcolemma. It binds the actin cytoskeleton to the transmembrane dystrophin–glycoprotein complex [23,24] and maintains membrane integrity and cellular homeostasis [25]. In our study, three antibodies targeting the rod-domain, N-terminal, and C-terminal dystrophins were utilized to stain the paraspinal musculoskeletal membranes in patients with AIS.

Our results indicated a significant loss of dystrophin in the paraspinal muscles of patients with AIS compared with those with SDD, confirming that patients with AIS have lower dystrophin levels. Additionally, we investigated patients with CS to identify if dystrophin insufficiency is a secondary effect of scoliosis. Patients with CS typically develop scoliosis before any paraspinal muscle pathology and do not show changes in dystrophin expression; thus, the difference in dystrophin levels between patients with AIS and those with CS indicates that dystrophin reduction in AIS is not incidental and may be important for the disease’s development. Longitudinal studies are required to identify if paraspinal muscle pathology precedes scoliosis in patients with AIS. This result of decreased dystrophin in the paravertebral muscles of patients with AIS is novel and has not been previously reported.

DMD gene mutation disables dystrophin expression, which causes DMD [26]. DMD, a fatal X-related recessive illness, affects the skeletal, respiratory, and cardiac muscles. Most patients are boys because of their genetic character [27]. Mutations in the gene of DMD and Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) reduce or produce abnormal dystrophin, which destroys the sarcolemma, causes cell necrosis and apoptosis, muscle atrophy in the limbs, and severe respiratory muscle and diaphragm muscle weakness, and some patients may even have scoliosis caused by paraspinal muscle involvement in the later stages [12].

This trial excluded participants with DMD or BMD symptoms, such as limb or chest muscle weakness. However, the patients with AIS in this study demonstrated a unique pattern of dystrophin protein deficiency, indicating a specific dystrophinopathy type. This study revealed pathogenic changes only in the paraspinal muscles, causing asymmetrical spine traction and scoliosis, unlike BMD or DMD.

Dystrophin is lacking in DMD except in revertant fibers. Truncated dystrophin reduces the functional protein intensity at different epitopes, such as the N-terminal and C-terminal, according to the “read frame” hypothesis in BMD [28]. This study revealed reduced immunostaining of AIS dystrophin at the rod-domain and C-terminal epitopes and almost no immunostaining at the bundle of the atrophic fibers’ N-terminal epitope. This immunological expression pattern resembles that of myodystrophy, but the aberrant expression of antimyodystrophy in AIS muscle biopsy tissues with atrophic muscle fibers was more pronounced compared with that in DMD or BMD. This does not imply that AIS should be classified as a neuromuscular disease, and it indicates a hypothesis that muscular lesions may play a role in AIS occurrence and development, providing a basis for future research.

Further confirm the role of the dystrophin

Patients CS and SDD exhibited the role of dystrophin in AIS etiology. We classified dystrophin into Nash–Moe and Cobb angle subgroups for further study.

Patients with higher Nash–Moe classification demonstrated increased dystrophin-2 depletion in the convex paraspinal muscles. This may be because the muscles on the convex side bear more tension, and they are prone to rotating to the convex side as they atrophy, similar to the research by Labrom [29]. Spinal rotation increased with dystrophin deficiency severity on the convex side, supporting its role in AIS. A significant association was observed between the Cobb angle and dystrophin-2 staining abnormalities on the concave side of the multifidus muscle. These results indicate that dystrophin-2 changes are associated with both pathological muscle changes and spinal scoliosis, indicating a potential role in AIS etiology.

This study had some limitations. First, the SDD and CS groups had confounding factors, including age and spinal muscle degeneration. However, patients with SDD demonstrated no significant dystrophin deficiency; thus, confounding factors, such as degeneration, likely did not affect its expression. Likewise, patients with CS, who have scoliosis but no dystrophin loss, indicate that scoliosis itself does not affect dystrophin expression. Therefore, the inclusion of patients with SDD and CS as controls helps achieve our purpose even with some confounding factors. Secondly, due to space limitations, we did not discuss some features that do not impact dystrophin. Finally, ethical concerns make it difficult to collect paraspinal muscle biopsies before or during the early scoliosis stages.

In summary, we conducted an ethically approved experiment indicating that decreased dystrophin levels may be related to AIS. However, more conclusive evidence requires research on muscles other than paraspinal muscles and further molecular biological studies or animal experiments, particularly focusing on dystrophin-2. In particular, we further knock out dystrophin through animal experiments to observe the lateral bending of the animals. Additionally, long-term patient follow-up is required to investigate if further reductions in dystrophin are associated with the curve progression in AIS.

Conclusions

Dysfunction of the paraspinal muscles plays a crucial role in AIS formation and progression. Dystrophin protein levels may significantly decrease or even disappear in AIS, and this loss is associated with scoliosis severity. More research on the paraspinal muscle function and dystrophin protein in AIS is warranted to explore its etiology.

Key Points

  • The etiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) remains unclear, involving genetics, epigenetics, endocrinology, developmental imbalance, and increasing focus on paraspinal muscles.

  • AIS patients exhibit significantly reduced dystrophin expression in paraspinal muscles, which may contribute to scoliosis, with reductions correlating to higher Cobb angles and rotation degrees.

  • Reduced dystrophin levels in paraspinal muscles may significantly impact muscle morphology and function, as it plays a key role in linking two cytoplasmic proteins to the extracellular matrix, especially dystrophin C-terminal.

  • Longitudinal studies and animal models are need-ed to explore the relationship between dystrophin deficiency and AIS progression further.

Notes

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding

This work is funded by Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (2021NSFB21L2308), China Disabled Persons’ Federation Fund of Assistive Technology (2021CDPFAT-05) and Zhishan Foundation Huanghong & Lili Project 2022.

Author Contributions

Administrative support: MY. Collection and assembly of data: JYL, JXL, DFZ. Data analysis and interpretation: JXL, ZKL. Manuscript writing: JYL, ZKL, JXL, DFZ. Scientific advice: MY, DFZ, ZXY. Final approval of manuscript: all authors.

References

1. Cheng JC, Castelein RM, Chu WC, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2015;1:15030.
2. Weinstein SL. The natural history of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2. 2019;39(6 Supplement 1):S44–6.
3. Perez-Machado G, Berenguer-Pascual E, Bovea-Marco M, et al. From genetics to epigenetics to unravel the etiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Bone 2020;140:115563.
4. Latalski M, Danielewicz-Bromberek A, Fatyga M, Latalska M, Krober M, Zwolak P. Current insights into the aetiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2017;137:1327–33.
5. de Seze M, Cugy E. Pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis: a review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2012;55:128–38.
6. Fidler MW, Jowett RL. Muscle imbalance in the aetiology of scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1976;58:200–1.
7. Spencer GS, Eccles MJ. Spinal muscle in scoliosis. J Neurol Sci 1976;30:143–54.
8. Khosla S, Tredwell SJ, Day B, Shinn SL, Ovalle WK. An ultrastructural study of multifidus muscle in progressive idiopathic scoliosis: changes resulting from a sarcolemma defect at the myotendinous junction. J Neurol Sci 1980;46:13–31.
9. Wajchenberg M, Martins DE, Luciano RP, et al. Histochemical analysis of paraspinal rotator muscles from patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e598.
10. Luciano Rde P, Puertas EB, Martins DE, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis without limb weakness: a differential diagnosis of core myopathy? BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015;16:179.
11. Li J, Yang Z, Yu M. Association study of single nucleotide polymorphism in tryptophan hydroxylase 1 gene with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021;100:e23733.
12. Zoabli G, Mathieu PA, Aubin CE. Magnetic resonance imaging of the erector spinae muscles in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: implication for scoliotic deformities. Scoliosis 2008;3:21.
13. Makino H, Seki S, Kitajima I, et al. Differential proteome analysis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with thoracolumbar/lumbar curvatures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019;20:247.
14. Dubowitz V, Sewry CA, Oldfors A, Lane R. Muscle biopsy: a practical approach 5th edth ed. London: Elsevier; 2020.
15. Na SJ, Kim WJ, Kim SM, Lee KO, Yoon B, Choi YC. Clinical, immunohistochemical, Western blot, and genetic analysis in dystrophinopathy. J Clin Neurosci 2013;20:1099–105.
16. Kumar V, Abbas AK, Aster JC. Robbins basic pathology 10th edth ed. Philadelphia (PA): Elsevier; 2018.
17. Altaf F, Gibson A, Dannawi Z, Noordeen H. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. BMJ 2013;346:f2508.
18. Brzoska E, Kalkowski L, Kowalski K, et al. Muscular contribution to adolescent idiopathic scoliosis from the perspective of stem cell-based regenerative medicine. Stem Cells Dev 2019;28:1059–77.
19. Veldhuizen AG, Wever DJ, Webb PJ. The aetiology of idiopathic scoliosis: biomechanical and neuromuscular factors. Eur Spine J 2000;9:178–84.
20. Malakoutian M, Noonan AM, Dehghan-Hamani I, et al. Dysfunctional paraspinal muscles in adult spinal deformity patients lead to increased spinal loading. Eur Spine J 2022;31:2383–98.
21. Schiaffino S, Reggiani C. Fiber types in mammalian skeletal muscles. Physiol Rev 2011;91:1447–531.
22. Le Rumeur E. Dystrophin and the two related genetic diseases, Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2015;15:14–20.
23. Ervasti JM, Campbell KP. Membrane organization of the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex. Cell 1991;66:1121–31.
24. Hoffman EP, Brown RH, Kunkel LM. Dystrophin: the protein product of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus. Cell 1987;51:919–28.
25. Houang EM, Sham YY, Bates FS, Metzger JM. Muscle membrane integrity in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: recent advances in copolymer-based muscle membrane stabilizers. Skelet Muscle 2018;8:31.
26. Blake DJ, Weir A, Newey SE, Davies KE. Function and genetics of dystrophin and dystrophin-related proteins in muscle. Physiol Rev 2002;82:291–329.
27. Yiu EM, Kornberg AJ. Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Paediatr Child Health 2015;51:759–64.
28. Goebel HH, Sewry CA, Weller RO. Muscle disease: pathology and genetics 2nd edth ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013.
29. Labrom FR, Izatt MT, Claus AP, Little JP. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 3D vertebral morphology, progression and nomenclature: a current concepts review. Eur Spine J 2021;30:1823–34.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

The subtypes of dystrophin immunostaining pattern of the concave side muscle from adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) (A–C), congenital scoliosis (CS) (D–F), and spinal degenerative disease (SDD) (G–I) groups, respectively. (A–C) The immunostaining of dystrophin-1, -2, and -3 of AIS showed the expression of dystrophin protein decreased variously (immunohistochemistry [IHC], ×10). (D–F) The immunostaining of dystrophin-1, -2, and -3 of CS showed no missing expression (IHC, ×20). (G–I) The immunostaining of dystrophin-1, -2, and -3 of SDD showed no missing expression. The immunostaining of dystrophin showed no missing expression of the residual muscle fibers (red arrow) (IHC, ×20).

Fig. 2

The dystrophin-2 staining pattern of the convex side muscle from adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in different Nash–Moe (NM) subgroups. (A) Dystrophin-2 immunostaining showed light-colored lineation or discontinuous lineation of the higher NM group (immunohistochemistry [IHC], ×20). (B) Dystrophin-2 immunostaining showed no missing expression or dizzy lineation of the lower NM group (IHC, ×20).

Fig. 3

The dystrophin-2 staining pattern of the concave side muscle from adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients from different Cobb angle patients. (A) Dystrophin-2 immunostaining showed a few dizzy lineation or discontinuous lineation of Cobb 40.3° patient (IHC, ×20). (B) Dystrophin-2 immunostaining showed light-colored lineation of Cobb 46.2° patient (IHC, ×20). (C) Dystrophin-2 immunostaining showed staining loss of cobb 52.1° patient (IHC, ×20).

Table 1

Clinical features of the patients

Characteristic AIS group CS group SDD group p-value
Age at surgery (yr) 16.51±5.20 21.40±13.98 60.90±14.31 <0.001*
Sex 0.610
 Male 13 8 5
 Female 27 12 15
Height (cm) 159.21±11.53 156.88±9.73 159.80±9.29 0.015*
Weight (kg) 47.24±13.44 53.68±13.05 66.90±12.55 <0.001*
Body mass index (kg/m2) 17.89±4.11 21.51±4.91 26.42±5.59 <0.001*
Cobb angle (°) 54.84±12.67 64.01±28.67 0.092
Nash–Moe classification 0.212
 I 7 8
 II 23 8
 III 10 4

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number.

AIS, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; CS, congenital scoliosis; SDD, spinal degenerative disease.

*

p<0.05.

Table 2

Pathological features of muscle biopsy in AIS patients and CS groups

Pathological feature AIS (n=40) CS (n=20) p-value
Atrophy degree 0.179
 Mild 4 (10.0) 1 (5.0)
 Mild-moderate or moderate 22 (55.0) 16 (80.0)
 Moderate-severe or severe 14 (35.0) 3 (15.0)
Atrophy pattern 0.008*
 Diffused 1 (2.5) 4 (20.0)
 Small group 13 (32.5) 10 (50.0)
 Small group or big group 11 (27.5) 5 (25.0)
 Big group 15 (37.5) 1 (5.0)
Percentage of atrophy (%) 42.58±17.86 26.75±17.95 0.019*
Degeneration of myofibers 0.067
 None 2 (5.0) 5 (25.0)
 Few 35 (87.5) 14 (70.0)
 Most 3 (7.5) 1 (5.0)
Compensatory hypertrophy 0.847
 None 6 (15.0) 3 (15.0)
 Few 23 (57.5) 11 (55.0)
 Several 8 (20.0) 5 (25.0)
 Most 3 (7.5) 1 (5.0)
Edema 0.028*
 None 4 (10.0) 8 (40.0)
 Few 29 (72.5) 9 (45.0)
 Most 7 (17.5) 3 (15.0)
Whorled fibers 0.307
 None 31 (77.5) 18 (90.0)
 Present 9 (22.5) 2 (10.0)
Internal nuclei 0.744
 None 8 (20.0) 5 (25.0)
 Present 32 (80.0) 15 (75.0)
Moth-eaten in NADH-TR 0.864
 None 1 (2.5) 1 (5.0)
 Few 20 (50.0) 8 (40.0)
 Several 15 (37.5) 9 (45.0)
 Most 4 (10.0) 2 (10.0)
Myofibers staining pattern 1.000
 Type I 12 (30.0) 5 (25.0)
 Type II 9 (22.5) 5 (25.0)
 Equally distributed 19 (47.5) 10 (50.0)
Myofibers atrophic pattern 1.000
 Type I 0 0
 Type II 9 (22.5) 4 (20.0)
 Equally distributed 31 (77.5) 16 (80.0)
Myosin staining pattern 0.511
 Several 33 (82.5) 15 (75.0)
 Small part 7 (17.5) 5 (25.0)
Dystrophin-1 staining pattern <0.001*
 Positive 1 (2.5) 11 (55.0)
 Uneven dyeing or dizzy lineation 22 (55.0) 6 (30.0)
 Light-colored lineation or discontinuous lineation 17 (42.5) 2 (10.0)
 Negative 0 1 (5.0)
Dystrophin-2 staining pattern <0.001*
 Positive 0 7 (35.0)
 Uneven dyeing or dizzy lineation 19 (47.5) 6 (30.0)
 Light-colored lineation or discontinuous lineation 19 (47.5) 5 (25.0)
 Negative 2 (5.0) 2 (10.0)
Dystrophin-3 staining pattern <0.001*
 Positive 0 7 (35.0)
 Uneven dyeing or dizzy lineation 0 1 (5.0)
 Light-colored lineation or discontinuous lineation 5 (12.5) 0
 Negative 35 (87.5) 12 (60.0)

Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard deviation.

AIS, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; CS, congenital scoliosis; NADH-TR, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-tetrazolium reductase.

*

p<0.05.

Table 3

Pathological features of muscle biopsy in AIS patients and SDD groups

Pathological feature AIS (n=40) SDD (n=20) p-value
Atrophy degree 0.001*
 Mild 4 (10.0) 0
 Mild-moderate or moderate 22 (55.0) 3 (15.0)
 Moderate-severe or severe 14 (35.0) 17 (85.0)
Atrophy pattern 0.154
 Diffused 1 (2.5) 2 (10.0)
 Small group 13 (32.5) 6 (30.0)
 Small group or big group 11 (27.5) 9 (45.0)
 Big group 15 (37.5) 3 (15.0)
Percentage of atrophy (%) 42.58±17.86 41.15±21.03 0.818
Degeneration of myofibers 0.002*
 None 2 (5.0) 8 (40.0)
 Few 35 (87.5) 11 (55.0)
 Most 3 (7.5) 1 (5.0)
Compensatory hypertrophy 0.051
 None 6 (15.0) 6 (30.0)
 Few 23 (57.5) 5 (25.0)
 Several 8 (20.0) 6 (30.0)
 Most 3 (7.5) 3 (15.0)
Edema <0.001*
 None 4 (10.0) 12 (60.0)
 Few 29 (72.5) 8 (40.0)
 Most 7 (17.5) 0
Whorled fibers 1.000
 None 31 (75.5) 15 (75.0)
 Present 9 (22.5) 5 (25.0)
Internal nuclei 0.736
 None 8 (20.0) 3 (15.0)
 Present 32 (80.0) 17 (85.0)
Moth-eaten in NADH-TR 0.191
 None 1 (2.5) 1 (5.0)
 Few 20 (50.0) 15 (75.0)
 Several 15 (37.5) 3 (15.0)
 Most 4 (10.0) 1 (5.0)
Myofibers staining pattern 0.203
 Type I 12 (30.0) 11 (55.0)
 Type II 9 (22.5) 3 (15.0)
 Equally distributed 19 (47.5) 6 (30.0)
Myofibers atrophic pattern 0.020*
 Type I 0 3 (15.0)
 Type II 9 (22.5) 7 (35.0)
 Equally distributed 31 (77.5) 10 (50.0)
Myosin staining pattern 0.249
 Several 33 (82.5) 19 (95.0)
 Small part 7 (17.5) 1 (5.0)
Dystrophin-1 staining pattern <0.001*
 Positive 1 (2.5) 11 (55.0)
 Uneven dyeing or dizzy lineation 22 (55.0) 7 (35.0)
 Light-colored lineation or discontinuous lineation 17 (42.5) 2 (10.0)
 Negative 0 0
Dystrophin-2 staining pattern <0.001*
 Positive 0 10 (50.0)
 Uneven dyeing or dizzy lineation 19 (47.5) 6 (30.0)
 Light-colored lineation or discontinuous lineation 19 (47.5) 4 (20.0)
 Negative 2 (5.0) 0
Dystrophin-3 staining pattern <0.001*
 Positive 0 6 (30.0)
 Uneven dyeing or dizzy lineation 0 3 (15.0)
 Light-colored lineation or discontinuous lineation 5 (12.5) 0
 Negative 35 (87.5) 11 (55.0)

Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard deviation.

AIS, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; SDD, spinal degenerative disease; NADH-TR, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-tetrazolium reductase.

*

p<0.05.

Table 4

Pathological features of muscle biopsy in AIS patients in different Nash–Moe subgroups

Pathological features Group 0&I (n=7) Group II&III (n=33) p-value
Dystrophin-1 staining pattern (concave side) 0.733
 Positive 0 1 (3.03)
 Uneven dyeing or dizzy lineation 3 (42.86) 19 (57.58)
 Light- colored lineation or discontinuous lineation 4 (57.14) 13 (39.39)
 Negative 0 0
Dystrophin-2 staining pattern (concave side) 1.000
 Positive 0 0
 Uneven dyeing or dizzy lineation 4 (57.14) 16 (48.48)
 Light-colored lineation or discontinuous lineation 3 (42.86) 15 (45.45)
 Negative 0 2 (6.06)
Dystrophin-3 staining pattern (concave side) 1.000
 Positive 0 0
 Uneven dyeing or dizzy lineation 0 0
 Light-colored lineation or discontinuous lineation 0 3 (9.09)
 Negative 7 (100.00) 30 (90.91)
Dystrophin-1 staining pattern (convex side) 0.517
 Positive 0 1 (3.03)
 Uneven dyeing or dizzy lineation 3 (42.86) 20 (60.61)
 Light-colored lineation or discontinuous lineation 4 (57.14) 12 (36.36)
 Negative 0 0
Dystrophin-2 staining pattern (convex side) 0.042*
 Positive 2 (28.57) 0
 Uneven dyeing or dizzy lineation 3 (42.86) 12 (36.36)
 Light-colored lineation or discontinuous lineation 2 (28.57) 16 (48.48)
 Negative 0 5 (15.15)
Dystrophin-3 staining pattern (convex side) 1.000
 Positive 0 0
 Uneven dyeing or dizzy lineation 0 2 (6.06)
 Light-colored lineation or discontinuous lineation 0 3 (9.09)
 Negative 7 (100.00) 28 (84.85)

Values are presented as number (%).

AIS, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

*

p<0.05.

Table 5

Correlation analysis between Cobb angle and dystrophin protein

Pathological features Spearman correlation coefficient p-value
Dystrophin-1 staining pattern (convex side) −0.04 0.733
Dystrophin-2 staining pattern (convex side) 0.214 0.104
Dystrophin-3 staining pattern (convex side) −0.202 0.211
Dystrophin-1 staining pattern (concave side) 0.228 0.158
Dystrophin-2 staining pattern (concave side) 0.396 0.011*
Dystrophin-3 staining pattern (concave side) −0.250 0.119
*

p<0.05.