1. Williams BA, Matsumoto H, McCalla DJ, et al. Development and initial validation of the Classification of Early-Onset Scoliosis (C-EOS). J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96:1359–67.
3. Ferguson RL. Medical and congenital comorbidities associated with spinal deformities in the immature spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89(Suppl 1): 34–41.
4. Bess S, Akbarnia BA, Thompson GH, et al. Complications of growing-rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis: analysis of one hundred and forty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92:2533–43.
5. Harrington PR. Scoliosis in the growing spine. Pediatr Clin North Am 1963;10:225–45.
6. Sankar WN, Acevedo DC, Skaggs DL. Comparison of complications among growing spinal implants. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35:2091–6.
7. Akbarnia BA, Marks DS, Boachie-Adjei O, Thompson AG, Asher MA. Dual growing rod technique for the treatment of progressive early-onset scoliosis: a multicenter study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30(17 Suppl): S46–57.
8. Urbanski W, Tucker S, Ember T, Nadarajah R. Single vs dual rod constructs in early onset scoliosis treated with magnetically controlled growing rods. Adv Clin Exp Med 2020;29:1169–74.
9. Thompson GH, Akbarnia BA, Kostial P, et al. Comparison of single and dual growing rod techniques followed through definitive surgery: a preliminary study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:2039–44.
10. Kim HJ, Iyer S. Proximal junctional kyphosis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2016;24:318–26.
11. Abdelaal A, Munigangaiah S, Trivedi J, Davidson N. Magnetically controlled growing rods in the treatment of early onset scoliosis: a single centre experience of 44 patients with mean follow-up of 4.1 years. Bone Jt Open 2020;1:405–14.
12. Teoh KH, Winson DM, James SH, et al. Do magnetic growing rods have lower complication rates compared with conventional growing rods? Spine J 2016;16(4 Suppl): S40–4.
16. Srivastava A, Gupta A, Hanasoge V, Jayaswal A. Complications of growing rod technique for early onset scoliosis. Indian Spine J 2023;6:27–36.
17. Watanabe K, Uno K, Suzuki T, et al. Risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis associated with dual-rod growing-rod surgery for early-onset scoliosis. Clin Spine Surg 2016;29:E428–33.
18. Bouthors C, Dukan R, Glorion C, Miladi L. Outcomes of growing rods in a series of early-onset scoliosis patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. J Neurosurg Spine 2020 Apr 24 [Epub].
https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.2.spine191308
19. Chen Z, Li S, Qiu Y, et al. Evolution of the postoperative sagittal spinal profile in early-onset scoliosis: is there a difference between rib-based and spine-based growth-friendly instrumentation? J Neurosurg Pediatr 2017;20:561–6.
21. Shah SA, Karatas AF, Dhawale AA, et al. The effect of serial growing rod lengthening on the sagittal profile and pelvic parameters in early-onset scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39:E1311–7.
22. Pan A, Hai Y, Yang J, Zhang Y, Zhang Y. Upper instrumented vertebrae distal to T2 leads to a higher incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis during growing-rod treatment for early onset scoliosis. Clin Spine Surg 2018;31:E337–41.
23. Chen Z, Qiu Y, Zhu Z, Li S, Chen X, Sun X. How does hyperkyphotic early-onset scoliosis respond to growing rod treatment? J Pediatr Orthop 2017;37:e593–8.
24. Carender CN, Morris WZ, Poe-Kochert C, Thompson GH, Son-Hing JP, Liu RW. Low pelvic incidence is associated with proximal junctional kyphosis in patients treated with growing rods. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016;41:792–7.
25. Yan P, Bao H, Qiu Y, et al. Mismatch between proximal rod contouring and proximal junctional angle: a predisposed risk factor for proximal junctional kyphosis in degenerative scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017;42:E280–7.