2. Demircan MN, Kutlay AM, Colak A, et al. Multilevel cervical fusion without plates, screws or autogenous iliac crest bone graft. J Clin Neurosci 2007;14:723–8.
4. Cabraja M, Abbushi A, Koeppen D, Kroppenstedt S, Woiciechowsky C. Comparison between anterior and posterior decompression with instrumentation for cervica spondylotic myelopathy: sagittal alignment and clinical outcome. Neurosurg Focus 2010;28:E15.
5. Feng F, Ruan W, Liu Z, Li Y, Cai L. Anterior versus posterior approach for the treatment of cervical compressive myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2016;27:26–33.
6. Mobbs RJ, Rao P, Chandran NK. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: analysis of surgical outcome with and without plating. J Clin Neurosci 2007;14:639–42.
7. Resnick DK, Trost GR. Use of ventral plates for cervical arthrodesis. Neurosurgery 2007;60(1 Supp1 1): S112–7.
8. Kim YS, Park JY, Moon BJ, Kim SD, Lee JK. Is stand alone PEEK cage the gold standard in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)?: results of a minimum 1-year follow up. J Clin Neurosci 2018;47:341–6.
9. Shousha M, Alhashash M, Allouch H, Boehm H. Reoperation rate after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using standalone cages in degenerative disease: a study of 2,078 cases. Spine J 2019;19:2007–12.
10. Smith GW, Robinson RA. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1958;40-A:607–24.
11. Bazaz R, Lee MJ, Yoo JU. Incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27:2453–8.
12. Chiang CJ, Kuo YJ, Chiang YF, Rau G, Tsuang YH. Anterior cervical fusion using a polyetheretherketone cage containing a bovine xenograftp: three to five-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:2524–428.
13. Kato S, Ganau M, Fehlings MG. Surgical decision-making in degenerative cervical myelopathy: anterior versus posterior approach. J Clin Neurosci 2018;58:7–12.
14. Luo J, Cao K, Huang S, et al. Comparison of anterior approach versus posterior approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 2015;24:1621–30.
15. Barbagallo GM, Romano D, Certo F, Milone P, Albanese V. Zero-P: a new zero-profile cage-plate device for single and multilevel ACDF: a single institution series with four years maximum follow-up and review of the literature on zero-profile devices. Eur Spine J 2013;22:Suppl 6. (Suppl 6): S868. –78.
16. Nambiar M, Phan K, Cunningham JE, Yang Y, Turner PL, Mobbs R. Locking stand-alone cages versus anterior plate constructs in single-level fusion for degenerative cervical disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 2017;26:2258–66.
18. Li Z, Wang H, Tang J, et al. Comparison of three reconstructive techniques in the surgical management of patients with four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017;42:E575–83.
19. Krieg SM, Meyer B. C5 palsy after multi-segmental cervical decompression: how can it be avoided? Orthopade 2018;47:483–8.
23. Cho DY, Lee WY, Sheu PC. Treatment of multilevel cervical fusion with cages. Surg Neurol 2004;62:378–85.
24. De la Garza-Ramos R, Xu R, Ramhmdani S, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes following 3- and 4-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2016;24:885–91.
26. Cuzzocrea F, Ivone A, Jannelli E, et al. PEEK versus metal cages in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiological comparative study. Musculoskelet Surg 2019;103:237–41.