Neuropathic pain after spinal surgery, the so-called failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), is a frequently observed troublesome disease entity. Although medications may be effective to some degree, many patients continue experiencing intolerable pain and functional disability. Only gabapentin has been proven effective in patients with FBSS. No relevant studies regarding manipulation or physiotherapy for FBSS have been published. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been widely investigated as a treatment option for chronic neuropathic pain, including FBSS. SCS was generally accepted to improve chronic back and leg pain, physical function, and sleep quality. Although the cost effectiveness of SCS has been proved in many studies, its routine application is limited considering that it is invasive and is associated with safety issues. Percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis has also shown good clinical outcomes; however, its effects persisted for only a short period. Because none of the current methods provide absolute superiority in terms of clinical outcomes, a multidisciplinary approach is required to manage this complex disease. Further studies concerning the etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and cost effectiveness of FBSS are warranted to deepen our understanding of this condition.
NeuralgiaFailed back surgery syndromeSpinal cord stimulationPercutaneous adhesiolysisIntroduction
Neuropathic pain after spinal surgery is a frequently observed troublesome disease entity for both patients and surgeons [123]. Patients complain of persistent back or leg pain, regardless of the absence of neural compression. Neuropathic pain is frequently not matched with the dermatome and is characterized by its severity and continuity [4]. Although medications may be effective to some degree, many patients continue experiencing intolerable pain and functional disability, leading to psychological disturbances such as depression or insomnia [56]. Because the exact causes of neuropathic pain after spinal surgery have not been identified in many studies, this disease entity has been termed failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) or post-lumbar surgery syndrome. However, this is a misnomer because it gives an impression of wrong surgery, although no definite evidence is usually found to provoke the symptoms [7]. In addition, many patients with neuropathic pain did not undergo spinal surgery. Only minor traumas, such as a mild traffic accident or falling down, can cause such severe and persistent neuropathic pain. In this respect, neuropathic pain after spinal surgery might be related to some changes in the pain modulation process [8910], which is supported by literature showing the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Many studies have attempted to reveal the etiology, epidemiology, treatment, and outcomes of FBSS. However, differing definitions and involvements of heterogeneous populations make it difficult to interpret the findings of such studies. With the recent dramatic increase in understanding neuropathic pain, outcomes of various treatments for FBSS have improved. However, none of the treatments completely resolved this complex disease entity. Thus, this study aimed to review the clinical efficacy, adverse effects, and cost effectiveness of each treatment modality for patients with chronic neuropathic pain after spinal surgery.
Etiology and Diagnosis of Neuropathic Pain after Spinal Surgery
Various causes such as residual stenosis, instability, a synovial cyst, a pseudomeningocele, internal disk disruption, epidural fibrosis, facet syndrome, sacroiliac joint syndrome, reflex sympathetic dystrophy, arachnoiditis, and psychological problems have been suggested as possible etiologies of neuropathic pain after spinal surgery [111213]. Determining the exact causes are frequently difficult using magnetic resonance imaging or neurophysiological studies. In addition, sagittal imbalance or back muscle problems can be potential causes of persistent pain [141516]. The difficulties in diagnosis lead to easy failure of any treatment. Revision surgical treatment reportedly showed an inferior efficacy if the structural causes were not preoperatively identified [1718]. Thus, careful history taking, physical examination, and reviews of pre- and postoperative status are considered basic and fundamental criteria for diagnosing FBSS.
The diagnosis of FBSS is somewhat vague and not universal and is considered to include heterogeneous patients who exhibit residual symptoms after spinal surgery. The difficulty in defining this complex disease entity has been well described [19]. However, doctors recognize this characteristic disease, which is supported by one survey study [20]. Although the Douleur Neuropathique en 4 and Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms have been suggested as screening tools for neuropathic pain [21], they are less reliable for identifying the neuropathic component of FBSS [22]. This diagnostic ambiguity is an obstacle in the clinical effectiveness of each treatment modality.
Clinical Outcomes of Each Treatment1. Medication
Only gabapentin has been proven effective in patients with FBSS. In one randomized controlled trial, gabapentin, at a daily maximal dose of 1,800 mg, showed more clinical efficacy than naproxen [23]. Oral gabapentin with an epidural steroid injection showed better results than the injection alone [24]. Pregabalin also has a preventive analgesic effect on postoperative neuropathic pain [25]. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs have minimal effects on FBSS [23]. The effect of antidepressants has not been reported. Although oral opioid is frequently used to relieve severe pain, its effectiveness in patients with FBSS is limited [26].
2. Exercise, manipulation, and physiotherapy
Only few studies have reported regarding the effect of exercise, manipulation, or physiotherapy on FBSS. A recent study evaluating different exercise programs reported that isokinetic or dynamic lumbar stabilization exercises were more effective than home exercises [27]. No relevant articles have been found regarding the effect of manipulation or physiotherapy on FBSS. Only one retrospective study showed the efficacy of chiropractic management of lumbar spine pain after spinal surgery [28].
3. Spinal cord stimulation
SCS has been widely investigated as a treatment option for chronic neuropathic pain, including FBSS. SCS was generally accepted to improve chronic back and leg pain, physical function, and sleep quality [2930]. The degree of evidence was qualified in one systematic review, which showed level II-1 or II-2 by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force for long-term relief [31]. Moreover, numerous studies have shown SCS effectiveness (Table 1) [3132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253]. Two randomized controlled trials compared SCS effectiveness with other treatments. A 2-year follow-up study demonstrated the effectiveness of SCS and medication in 48% and 9% of patients, respectively [54]. In the other study, SCS was more effective than repeated spinal surgery (47% vs. 12%, p<0.01) [55]. Regardless of its invasiveness and several complications, SCS is considered to be a relatively safe technique [56].
4. Epidural adhesiolysis
Epidural adhesiolysis releases epidural fibrosis, which could be a source of pain [57]. Manchikanti et al. [58] revealed superior clinical outcomes with epidural adhesiolysis compared with an epidural steroid injection at 1-year follow-up. In addition, several studies showed the short-term (6 months) effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis (Table 2) [5960616263]. These findings were supported by recent systematic reviews [646566]. Complication rates are high in epidural adhesiolysis [67].
5. Injection therapy
Studies that support the effectiveness of injection therapy in FBSS are limited. Although patients who underwent an epidural steroid injection showed immediate improvement, the effect of the therapy deteriorated at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups [6869]. The differences of clinical outcomes on the basis of injection materials remains unclear [6870].
6. Radiofrequency therapy
There have been few attempts to use radiofrequency to control pain in FBSS. In one study, pulse radiofrequency of the dorsal root ganglion showed good results for three patients during a short-term period [71]. In another study, radiofrequency neurotomy was successful if zygapophysial joint pain existed in patients with FBSS [72].
7. Surgical treatment
Many studies have revealed the effectiveness of various surgeries, including repeated decompression, instrumented fusion, release of adhesion, or total disk replacement (Table 3) [7374757677787980]. However, varying success rates, ranging from 35% to 92%, have been reported in a short-term (1 year) follow-up. This clinical effect has been significantly aggravated in long-term follow-ups.
Cost Effectiveness
Cost effectiveness is another important consideration for evaluating outcomes per unit, as well as insurance policy recommendations. Because of the considerable economic burden of FBSS, a cost-effectiveness analysis should be performed [81]. Many authors have suggested that SCS is more cost effective than conventional medication or surgery as a treatment of FBSS, regardless of the initial high cost [82838485]. This cost effectiveness is unclear in patients receiving workers' compensation [86]. Overall, the cost-effectiveness analyses of SCS for FBSS are summarized in Table 4 [84858788]. Besides SCS, only one study supported the cost effectiveness of long-term intrathecal morphine therapy [89]. No studies have been found regarding the cost effectiveness of percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis.
Discussion
FBSS is a challenge for surgeons, pain specialists, and primary care providers because of its vague etiology and lack of definite treatment protocols, thereby requiring a multidisciplinary treatment approach [11]. Thorough history taking, physical examination, and careful reviews of imaging are required, followed by the establishment of adequate treatment strategies. Because conventional medical treatments have been considered ineffective, the efficacy, safety, and cost effectiveness of other interventional modalities have been widely investigated.
Among the various interventions, research on SCS has been increasing; SCS is reportedly effective, relatively safe, and cost effective. To relieve pain, SCS is considered to activate dorsal column fibers, which suppress the neuronal activity by activating inhibitory interneurons [90]. Most studies regarding the efficacy of SCS have been retrospective case series, which could contain an intention bias by investigators. Because SCS is an invasive procedure, it is not considered as a primary treatment for FBSS. Complications associated with SCS are not negligible. The most commonly reported complications include hardware malfunction and wound infection [91]. However, fatal complications such as epidural hematoma or spinal cord injury could occur. Nevertheless, as a last resort, a temporary insertion of a cord stimulator can be considered. If it had good clinical outcomes, then a permanent insertion is considered. Several studies suggested an algorithm to manage FBSS with SCS [9293]. The technology of SCS has dramatically developed. The efficacy of SCS may increase by new leads in a multicolumn design and a greater number of contact sites (ESTIMET study) [9495].
Percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis was originally developed to remove the epidural adhesion by surgical intervention, annular tear, or inflammatory response [57]. It reportedly had a strong short-term (3 months) efficacy and moderate long-term (>3 months) efficacy in patients with chronic low back pain [96]. In a recently published systematic review, percutaneous adhesiolysis was efficient in patients with lumbar post-surgery syndrome with level II evidence by Interventional Pain Management Techniques-Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk for Bias Assessment [66]. Although weak positive evidence exists regarding epidural adhesiolysis being more effective than epidural steroid injection in FBSS, the complication rates are also higher [67].
Injection therapy can be used as a primary treatment on the basis of its procedure simplicity and rare complications. The various injection procedures include epidural injection (caudal, transforaminal), sympathetic nerve block, intrathecal injection, prolotherapy, and a combination therapy [68979899]. Regardless of the various therapeutic approaches, temporary clinical improvements and lack of a control group are considered to be limitations of studies. More studies are required to reveal the efficacy of radiofrequency therapy.
Surgical management of FBSS showed only limited evidence with variable outcomes, likely caused by the vague definition of FBSS. If a study included surgically correctable cases (i.e., residual stenosis, instability, or disk degeneration), then the clinical outcomes could obviously be improved after careful diagnostic procedures. Therefore, the outcomes of revision surgery for chronic neuropathic pain after index spinal surgery are judged to be ineffective.
Because no single approach has produced excellent results, a multidisciplinary approach is required to manage patients with FBSS. Chronic pain is related to psychological distress after lumbar surgery [100101]. Thus, psychological control is also important. Concurrent rehabilitation by exercise or physiotherapy will be helpful to enhance the clinical effect of other interventions.
Conclusions
FBSS is considered troublesome for both patients and doctors because it usually does not respond to conventional medication or injection therapy. Although the literature reports relatively good clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness with the use of SCS, its routine application should be limited considering that it is invasive and is associated with safety issues. Meanwhile, although epidural adhesiolysis has shown good clinical outcomes, its effects persisted for only a short period. A multidisciplinary treatment approach is required to manage this complex disease entity because none of the current methods provide absolute superiority. Further studies regarding the etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and cost effectiveness of FBSS are warranted to deepen our understanding of the condition.
Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
ChanCWPengPFailed back surgery syndrome20111257760621463472ThomsonSFailed back surgery syndrome: definition, epidemiology and demographics20137565926516498ThomsonSJacquesLDemographic characteristics of patients with severe neuropathic pain secondary to failed back surgery syndrome2009920621519281499LongDMFiltzerDLBenDebbaMHendlerNHClinical features of the failed-back syndrome19886961712967891YalbuzdagSAErolAMSengulITemperament and character profile in failed back surgery syndrome: a cross-sectional clinical study20162691291727476913MonlezunOLode-KolzKRoulaudMA prospective study evaluating sleep quality in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome patients treated by multicolumn spinal cord stimulation: study design protocol and presentation of the study population201561Suppl 1S117S12425245920RigoardPDesaiMJTaylorRSFailed back surgery syndrome: what's in a name? A proposal to replace “FBSS” by “POPS”201561Suppl 1S16S2125665773De AndresJVan BuytenJPNeural modulation by stimulation20066394517309708KishimaHSaitohYOshinoSModulation of neuronal activity after spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain; H(2)15O PET study2010492564256919874903KornelsenJSboto-FrankensteinUMcIverTDefault mode network functional connectivity altered in failed back surgery syndrome20131448349123498869BaberZErdekMAFailed back surgery syndrome: current perspectives2016997998727853391BokovAIsrelovASkorodumovAAleynikASimonovAMlyavykhSAn analysis of reasons for failed back surgery syndrome and partial results after different types of surgical lumbar nerve root decompression20111454555722086096RigoardPBlondSDavidRMertensPPathophysiological characterisation of back pain generators in failed back surgery syndrome (part B)201561Suppl 1S35S4425456443JangJSLeeSHMinJHKimSKHanKMMaengDHSurgical treatment of failed back surgery syndrome due to sagittal imbalance2007323081308718091505BordoniBMarelliFFailed back surgery syndrome: review and new hypotheses20169172226834497ZoidlGGrifkaJBolukiDMolecular evidence for local denervation of paraspinal muscles in failed-back surgery/postdiscotomy syndrome200322717712670053AssakerRZairiFFailed back surgery syndrome: to re-operate or not to re-operate? A retrospective review of patient selection and failures201561Suppl 1S77S8225662850KimSSMichelsenCBRevision surgery for failed back surgery syndrome1992179579601387978Al KaisyAPangDDesaiMJFailed back surgery syndrome: who has failed?201561Suppl 1S6S1425595592TharmanathanPAdamsonJAshbyREldabeSDiagnosis and treatment of failed back surgery syndrome in the UK: mapping of practice using a cross-sectional survey2012614215226516486HamdanALunaJDDel PozoEGalvezRDiagnostic accuracy of two questionnaires for the detection of neuropathic pain in the Spanish population20141810110923776139MarkmanJDKressBTFrazerMHansonRKoganVHuangJHScreening for neuropathic characteristics in failed back surgery syndromes: challenges for guiding treatment20151652053025530081KhosraviMBAzematiSSahmeddiniMAGabapentin versus naproxen in the management of failed back surgery syndrome: a randomized controlled trial201465313724988825ZencirciBAnalgesic efficacy of oral gabapentin added to standard epidural corticosteroids in patients with failed back surgery2010220721122291506CanosACortLFernandezYPreventive analgesia with pregabalin in neuropathic pain from “failed back surgery syndrome”: assessment of sleep quality and disability20161734435226398133AndersonJTHaasARPercyRWoodsSTAhnUMAhnNUChronic opioid therapy after lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative disc disease in a workers' compensation setting2015401775178426192725KarahanAYSahinNBaskentAComparison of effectiveness of different exercise programs in treatment of failed back surgery syndrome: a randomized controlled trial201661710.3233/BMR-160722[Epub]KruseRACambronJChiropractic management of postsurgical lumbar spine pain: a retrospective study of 32 cases20113440841221807265TaylorRSDesaiMJRigoardPTaylorRJPredictors of pain relief following spinal cord stimulation in chronic back and leg pain and failed back surgery syndrome: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis20141448950523834386KellyGABlakeCPowerCKO'KeeffeDFullenBMThe impact of spinal cord stimulation on physical function and sleep quality in individuals with failed back surgery syndrome: a systematic review20121679380222337598FreyMEManchikantiLBenyaminRMSchultzDMSmithHSCohenSPSpinal cord stimulation for patients with failed back surgery syndrome: a systematic review20091237939719305486De La PorteCVan de KelftESpinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome19935255618446436de VosCCBomMJVannesteSLendersMWde RidderDBurst spinal cord stimulation evaluated in patients with failed back surgery syndrome and painful diabetic neuropathy20141715215924655043DevulderJDe LaatMVan BastelaereMRollyGSpinal cord stimulation: a valuable treatment for chronic failed back surgery patients1997132963019185435LeDouxMSLangfordKHSpinal cord stimulation for the failed back syndrome1993181911948441933NorthRBKiddDHOlinJSpinal cord stimulation for axial low back pain: a prospective, controlled trial comparing dual with single percutaneous electrodes2005301412141815959371NorthRBEwendMGLawtonMTKiddDHPiantadosiSFailed back surgery syndrome: 5-year follow-up after spinal cord stimulator implantation1991286926991831547OhnmeissDDRashbaumRFPatient satisfaction with spinal cord stimulation for predominant complaints of chronic, intractable low back pain2001135836314588316RainovNGHeideckeVBurkertWShort test-period spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome19963941448811655VonhogenLHVancampTVannesteSPercutaneously implanted plates in failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS)20111431932421992425DarioAFortiniGBertolloDBacuzziAGrizzettiCCuffariSTreatment of failed back surgery syndrome2001410511022151654WilleFBreelJDikkeboerJSpinal cord stimulation for FBSS with significant low back pain201114464WilleFBreelJHollmannMHigh frequency stimulation with a single 8-polar lead: one year follow-up: spine201316e139VangeneugdenJSpecify 5-6-5 electrode (Medtronic) for treatment of failed back syndrome: results in 24 patients with a mean follow up of 17 months201114468SeijoFMorenoJMJaradatMLopezJMSpinal cord stimulation in post-surgical low back pain19936241247RigoardPJacquesLMonlezunOTreatment of the back pain component of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) by multi-column spinal cord stimulation: a multicentre prospective study201316e218MillerJPLeizmanDCombined spinal cord and subcutaneous neurostimulation for back and leg pain due to failed back surgery syndrome201067550LevequeJCVillavicencioATBulsaraKRRubinLGoreckiJPSpinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome200141922151565GatzinskyKVer DonckABaardsenRBuschmanROctad study: evaluation of the effectiveness of octopolar leads in patients with failed back surgery syndrome with chronic low back and/or leg pain during a one year follow-up period. A prospective, multicentre, open-label, non-randomized study201316e83De VosCCDijkstraCLendersMWPain reduction in back and legs with percutaneous paddle leads20104113CarballalCFSierraOMVallejoBIJuretschkeFRUserosTPSpinal cord stimulation for patients with failed back surgery syndrome201316e75Al-KaisyAVan BuytenJPSmetIPalmisaniSSmithTHigh frequency spinal cord stimulation (HF-SCS) therapy in failed back: Surgerysyndrome (FBSS) patients with predominant back pain2013221 SupplS56AbeloosLDe WitteORiquetRTunaTMathieuNLong-term outcome of patients treated with spinal cord stimulation for therapeutically refractory failed back surgery syndrome: a retrospective study20115711411921907361KumarKNorthRTaylorRSpinal cord stimulation vs. conventional medical management: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study of Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (PROCESS Study)2005821321822151547NorthRBKumarKWallaceMSSpinal cord stimulation versus re-operation in patients with failed back surgery syndrome: an international multicenter randomized controlled trial (EVIDENCE study)20111433033521992427BenderskyDYampolskyCIs spinal cord stimulation safe? A review of its complications2014821359136823851231ManchikantiLBakhitCEPercutaneous lysis of epidural adhesions20003466416906207ManchikantiLSinghVCashKAPampatiVAssessment of effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis and caudal epidural injections in managing post lumbar surgery syndrome: 2-year follow-up of a randomized, controlled trial2012559760823293536AvellanalMDiaz-ReganonGInterlaminar approach for epiduroscopy in patients with failed back surgery syndrome200810124424918552347TakeshimaNMiyakawaHOkudaKEvaluation of the therapeutic results of epiduroscopic adhesiolysis for failed back surgery syndrome200910240040719164308LeeJHLeeSHClinical effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis versus transforaminal epidural steroid injection in patients with postlumbar surgery syndrome201338E251GruytersIDe VooghtPPuylaertMMestrumRVan ZundertJVanelderenPOutcome and extent of epidural adhesiolysis attainable with epiduroscopy in failed back surgery syndrome relates to the type of previous lumbar surgery201330207208GeypenEVanelderenPVan ZundertJDe VooghtPHeylenRNguyenKRetrospective analysis of long-term results after spinal endoscopic adhesiolysis for the treatment of failed BSS201431218EpterRSHelmS2ndHayekSMBenyaminRMSmithHSAbdiSSystematic review of percutaneous adhesiolysis and management of chronic low back pain in post lumbar surgery syndrome20091236137819305485Helm IiSBenyaminRMChopraPDeerTRJustizRPercutaneous adhesiolysis in the management of chronic low back pain in post lumbar surgery syndrome and spinal stenosis: a systematic review201215E435E46222828693ManchikantiLManchikantiKNGhariboCGKayeADEfficacy of percutaneous adhesiolysis in the treatment of lumbar post surgery syndrome20166e2617227574583JamisonDEHsuECohenSPEpidural adhesiolysis: an evidence-based review2014586576DevulderJDeenePDe LaatMVan BastelaereMBrusselmansGRollyGNerve root sleeve injections in patients with failed back surgery syndrome: a comparison of three solutions19991513213510382927FredmanBZoharEBen NunMIraqiRJedeikinRGepsteinRThe effect of repeated epidural sympathetic nerve block on “failed back surgery syndrome” associated chronic low back pain199911465110396718ManchikantiLSinghVCashKAPampatiVDattaSPreliminary results of a randomized, equivalence trial of fluoroscopic caudal epidural injections in managing chronic low back pain: Part 3: post surgery syndrome20081181783119057628HussainAMAfshanGUse of pulsed radiofrequency in failed back surgery syndrome20071735335517623586KlessingerSZygapophysial joint pain in post lumbar surgery syndrome: the efficacy of medial branch blocks and radiofrequency neurotomy20131437437723241083ArtsMPKolsNIOnderwaterSMPeulWCClinical outcome of instrumented fusion for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome: a case series of 100 patients20121541213121722588339BiondiJGreenbergBJRedecompression and fusion in failed back syndrome patients199033623692151992DuggalNMendiondoIParesHRAnterior lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of failed back surgery syndrome: an outcome analysis20045463664315028138FritschEWHeiselJRuppSThe failed back surgery syndrome: reasons, intraoperative findings, and long-term results: a report of 182 operative treatments1996216266338852320MarkwalderTMBattagliaMFailed back surgery syndrome. Part II: Surgical techniques, implant choice, and operative results in 171 patients with instability of the lumbar spine19931231291348237490NorthRBCampbellJNJamesCSFailed back surgery syndrome: 5-year follow-up in 102 patients undergoing repeated operation1991286856901831546SkafGBouclaousCAlarajAChamounRClinical outcome of surgical treatment of failed back surgery syndrome20056448348816293454DelamarterRZiglerJJanssenMTotal disc replacement in the failed back surgery patient: analysis of prospective, randomized and continued access cohorts201111SuppleS151TaylorRSTaylorRJThe economic impact of failed back surgery syndrome2012617418126516490BalaMMRiemsmaRPNixonJKleijnenJSystematic review of the (cost-)effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation for people with failed back surgery syndrome20082474175618936591TaylorRSRyanJO'DonnellREldabeSKumarKNorthRBThe cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome20102646346920551721NorthRBKiddDShipleyJTaylorRSSpinal cord stimulation versus reoperation for failed back surgery syndrome: a cost effectiveness and cost utility analysis based on a randomized, controlled trial20076136136817762749ZuccoFCiampichiniRLavanoACost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of spinal cord stimulation in patients with failed back surgery syndrome: results from the PRECISE study20151826627625879722HollingworthWTurnerJAWeltonNJComstockBADeyoRACosts and cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for failed back surgery syndrome: an observational study in a workers' compensation population2011362076208321738098TaylorRJTaylorRSSpinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome: a decision-analytic model and cost-effectiveness analysis20052135135816110715MancaAKumarKTaylorRSQuality of life, resource consumption and costs of spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management in neuropathic pain patients with failed back surgery syndrome (PROCESS trial)2008121047105818359255de LissovoyGBrownREHalpernMHassenbuschSJRossECost-effectiveness of long-term intrathecal morphine therapy for pain associated with failed back surgery syndrome199719961129083712MelzackRWallPDPain mechanisms: a new theory19651509719795320816KleiberJCMarlierBBannwarthMTheretEPeruzziPLitreFIs spinal cord stimulation safe? A review of 13 years of implantations and complications201617268969527776893AvellanalMDiaz-ReganonGOrtsASotoSOne-year results of an algorithmic approach to managing failed back surgery syndrome20141931331625222573GantyPSharmaMFailed back surgery syndrome: a suggested algorithm of care2012615316126516487MonlezunOVoirinJRoulaudM“MAST” prospective study: value of minimal access spine technologies technique for multicolumn spinal cord stimulation surgical lead implantation in the context of a French multicentre randomized controlled trial (ESTIMET study)201561Suppl 1S125S13025224961RoulaudMDurand-ZaleskiIIngrandPMulticolumn spinal cord stimulation for significant low back pain in failed back surgery syndrome: design of a national, multicentre, randomized, controlled health economics trial (ESTIMET Study)201561Suppl 1S109S11625456442RaczGBHeavnerJETrescotAPercutaneous lysis of epidural adhesions--evidence for safety and efficacy2008827728618503627ManchikantiLSinghVCashKAPampatiVDattaSManagement of pain of post lumbar surgery syndrome: one-year results of a randomized, double-blind, active controlled trial of fluoroscopic caudal epidural injections20101350952121102963DeerTRCarawayDLKimCKDempseyCDStewartCDMcNeilKFClinical experience with intrathecal bupivacaine in combination with opioid for the treatment of chronic pain related to failed back surgery syndrome and metastatic cancer pain of the spine2002227427814589479WilkinsonHAInjection therapy for enthesopathies causing axial spine pain and the “failed back syndrome”: a single blinded, randomized and crossover study2005816717316850071ShamjiMFRodriguezJShcharinskyAPaulDHigh rates of undiagnosed psychological distress exist in a referral population for spinal cord stimulation in the management of chronic pain20161941442126607291AndersonJTHaasARPercyRWoodsSTAhnUMAhnNUClinical depression is a strong predictor of poor lumbar fusion outcomes among workers' compensation subjects20154074875625955092
Observational studies to reveal the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation for FBSS
FBSS, failed back surgery syndrome; SCS, spinal cord stimulation; VAS, visual analog scale; LBP, low back pain; HF, high frequency.
Observational studies to reveal the effectiveness of epidural adhesiolysis for FBSS
FBSS, failed back surgery syndrome; VAS, visual analog scale; RDQ, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire; ODI, Oswestry disability index; JOA, Japanese Orthopaedic Association; TFESI, transforaminal epidural steroid injection; NRS, numeric rating scale; ALIF, anterior lumbar interbody fusion; PLIF, posterior lumbar interbody fusion; GPE, global perceived effect.
Observational studies to reveal the effectiveness of reoperation for FBSS
FBSS, failed back surgery syndrome; ALIF, anterior lumbar interbody fusion; TDR, total disc replacement.
Cost-effectiveness analyses of spinal cord stimulation for FBSS
FBSS, failed back surgery syndrome; SCS, spinal cord stimulation; EQ-5D, EuroQol 5-dimensions questionnare; QALY, quality-adjusted life years; WTP, willingness to pay; RCT, randomized controlled trial; CMM, conventional medical management.