CrossRef Text and Data Mining
Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining.
Comparative Prospective Study Reporting Intraoperative Parameters, Pedicle Screw Perforation, and Radiation Exposure in Navigation-Guided versus Non-navigated Fluoroscopy-Assisted Minimal Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Tarun Dusad, Vishal Kundnani, Shumayou Dutta, Ankit Patel, Gaurav Mehta, Mahendra Singh
Asian Spine J. 2018;12(2):309-316.   Published online April 16, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2018.12.2.309

Excel Download

Comparative Prospective Study Reporting Intraoperative Parameters, Pedicle Screw Perforation, and Radiation Exposure in Navigation-Guided versus Non-navigated Fluoroscopy-Assisted Minimal Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Asian Spine Journal. 2018;12(2):309-316   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Letter to the Editor Regarding “Comparison of Radiation Exposure Between O-Arm Navigated and C-Arm Guided Screw Placement in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion”
World Neurosurgery. 2021;150:216-217   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Intraoperative Three-Dimensional Navigation Versus Fluoroscopy: A Comparison of Time Demand, Radiation Exposure, and Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF)
Neurosurgery. 2019;66(Supplement 1):310-601   Crossref logo
Link1

Virtu4D Navigation-Guided Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation
Technical Advances in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. 2022;241-249   Crossref logo
Link1

P38. Intraoperative 3D navigation versus fluoroscopy: a comparison of time-demand, radiation exposure and outcomes in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF)
The Spine Journal. 2019;19(9):S175-S176   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Comparison of Radiation Exposure Between O-Arm Navigated and C-Arm Guided Screw Placement in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
World Neurosurgery. 2020;139:e489-e495   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Robot-Assisted Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Pedicle Screw Placement in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease
World Neurosurgery. 2019;125:e429-e434   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

An Outcome and Cost Analysis Comparing Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Intraoperative Fluoroscopy versus Computed Tomography–Guided Navigation
World Neurosurgery. 2016;94:255-260   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. 2016;50(5):464-472   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Surgeon, staff, and patient radiation exposure in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: impact of 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation partially replacing conventional fluoroscopy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Trials. 2015;16(1):   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3 Link4