 |
|
Sacropelvic Parameters and L5 Spondylolysis: Computed Tomography Analysis
Joseph Frederick Baker
Asian Spine J. 2022;16(1):66-74. Published online 2021 Mar 11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0442
|
|
Citations to this article as recorded by
 Evaluation of Sacrum Measurements in Healthy Individuals and Patients with L5-S1 Spondylolisthesis
Esin Erbek, Nadire Unver Dogan, Mehmet Oztürk, Neriman Akdam, Zeliha Fazliogullari, Ahmet Kagan Karabulut
European Journal of Therapeutics.2024;[Epub] CrossRef A radiological parametric comparison of low-grade lytic spondylolisthesis to degenerative spondylolisthesis – A retrospective approach to establish its dysplastic origin
K. R. Pratap, Vikas Tandon, Aditya Sunder Goparaju, Aayush Aryal
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine.2024; 15(1): 30. CrossRef Radiological Characteristics of Low-Grade Lytic Spondylolisthesis: Similarity to Dysplastic Spondylolisthesis
Sung Tan Cho, Jin Hwan Kim
Asian Spine Journal.2023; 17(2): 347. CrossRef Comparison of L5 pedicle morphology in patients with and without L5 spondylolysis
Joseph F. Baker
Clinical Anatomy.2022; 35(2): 222. CrossRef Cost-Utility Analysis of Sacroiliac Joint Fusion in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Multi-Level Lumbar Fusion to the Sacrum
Stacey J Ackerman, Gurvinder S Deol, David W Polly
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research.2022; Volume 14: 523. CrossRef
|