 |
|
Sacropelvic Parameters and L5 Spondylolysis: Computed Tomography Analysis
Joseph Frederick Baker
Asian Spine J. 2022;16(1):66-74. Published online 2021 Mar 11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0442
|
|
Citations to this article as recorded by
 Comparative analysis of morphologival parameters in isolated and fused L5 spondylolysis patients on the basis of CT features
Rui Ma, Xiaoxia Huang, Luyao Li, Ye Kai, Jun Liu, Gao Leilei, Xiangning Sun, Yong Teng
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2025;[Epub] CrossRef Evaluation of Sacrum Measurements in Healthy Individuals and Patients with L5-S1 Spondylolisthesis
Esin Erbek, Nadire Unver Dogan, Mehmet Oztürk, Neriman Akdam, Zeliha Fazliogullari, Ahmet Kagan Karabulut
European Journal of Therapeutics.2024; 30(2): 186. CrossRef A radiological parametric comparison of low-grade lytic spondylolisthesis to degenerative spondylolisthesis – A retrospective approach to establish its dysplastic origin
K. R. Pratap, Vikas Tandon, Aditya Sunder Goparaju, Aayush Aryal
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine.2024; 15(1): 30. CrossRef Radiological Characteristics of Low-Grade Lytic Spondylolisthesis: Similarity to Dysplastic Spondylolisthesis
Sung Tan Cho, Jin Hwan Kim
Asian Spine Journal.2023; 17(2): 347. CrossRef Comparison of L5 pedicle morphology in patients with and without L5 spondylolysis
Joseph F. Baker
Clinical Anatomy.2022; 35(2): 222. CrossRef Cost-Utility Analysis of Sacroiliac Joint Fusion in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Multi-Level Lumbar Fusion to the Sacrum
Stacey J Ackerman, Gurvinder S Deol, David W Polly
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research.2022; Volume 14: 523. CrossRef
|