1. Norvell DC, Dettori JR, Skelly AC, Riew KD, Chapman JR, Anderson PA. Methodology for the systematic reviews on an adjacent segment pathology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012 37(22 Suppl): S10–S17. PMID:
22872224.
2. Kaito T, Hosono N, Mukai Y, Makino T, Fuji T, Yonenobu K. Induction of early degeneration of the adjacent segment after posterior lumbar interbody fusion by excessive distraction of lumbar disc space. J Neurosurg Spine 2010 12:671–679. PMID:
20515354.
3. Lee MJ, Dettori JR, Standaert CJ, Ely CG, Chapman JR. Indication for spinal fusion and the risk of adjacent segment pathology: does reason for fusion affect risk? A systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012 37(22 Suppl): S40–S51. PMID:
22872219.
4. Lund T, Oxland TR. Adjacent level disk disease: is it really a fusion disease? Orthop Clin North Am 2011 42:529–541. PMID:
21944589.
5. Kumar A, Beastall J, Hughes J, et al. Disc changes in the bridged and adjacent segments after Dynesys dynamic stabilization system after two years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008 33:2909–2914. PMID:
19092623.
6. Sengupta DK. Dynamic stabilization devices in the treatment of low back pain. Neurol India 2005 53:466–474. PMID:
16565539.
7. Liu CL, Zhong ZC, Shih SL, Hung C, Lee YE, Chen CS. Influence of Dynesys system screw profile on adjacent segment and screw. J Spinal Disord Tech 2010 23:410–417. PMID:
20683426.
8. Maserati MB, Tormenti MJ, Panczykowski DM, Bonfield CM, Gerszten PC. The use of a hybrid dynamic stabilization and fusion system in the lumbar spine: preliminary experience. Neurosurg Focus 2010 28:E2.
9. Cheh G, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Adjacent segment disease followinglumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007 32:2253–2257. PMID:
17873819.
10. Kim CH, Chung CK, Jahng TA. Comparisons of outcomes after single or multilevel dynamic stabilization: effects on adjacent segment. J Spinal Disord Tech 2011 24:60–67. PMID:
21270627.
11. Kanayama M, Togawa D, Hashimoto T, Shigenobu K, Oha F. Motion-preserving surgery can prevent early breakdown of adjacent segments: comparison of posterior dynamic stabilization with spinal fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009 22:463–467. PMID:
20075807.
12. Kaner T, Sasani M, Oktenoglu T, Ozer AF. Dynamic stabilization of the spine: a new classification system. Turk Neurosurg 2010 20:205–215. PMID:
20401848.
13. von Strempel A. Dynamic posterior stabilization with the cosmic system. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2010 22:561–572. PMID:
21153013.
14. Stoffel M, Behr M, Reinke A, Stuer C, Ringel F, Meyer B. Pedicle screw-based dynamic stabilization of the thoracolumbar spine with the Cosmic-system: a prospective observation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010 152:835–843. PMID:
20084412.
15. Coe JD, Kitchel SH, Meisel HJ, Wingo CH, Lee SE, Jahng TA. NFlex dynamic stabilization system: two-year clinical outcomes of multi-center study. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2012 51:343–349. PMID:
22949963.
16. Wang JC, Arnold PM, Hermsmeyer JT, Norvell DC. Do lumbar motion preserving devices reduce the risk of adjacent segment pathology compared with fusion surgery? A systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012 37(22 Suppl): S133–S143. PMID:
22872221.
17. Lee SE, Park SB, Jahng TA, Chung CK, Kim HJ. Clinical experience of the dynamic stabilization system for the degenerative spine disease. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2008 43:221–226. PMID:
19096600.
18. Hoppe S, Schwarzenbach O, Aghayev E, Bonel H, Berlemann U. Long-term outcome after monosegmental L4/5 stabilization for degenerative spondylolisthesis with the dynesys device. Clin Spine Surg 2016 29:72–77. PMID:
26889990.