Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Decompression in Elderly Patients with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Morphological Analysis
Seungman Ha, Youngho Hong, Seungcheol Lee
Asian Spine J. 2018;12(2):285-293.   Published online 2018 Apr 16     DOI: https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2018.12.2.285
Citations to this article as recorded by Crossref logo
Comparison of the Tubular Approach and Uniportal Interlaminar Full-Endoscopic Approach in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Our 3-Year Results
Halil Ibrahim Süner, Juan Pablo Castaño, Andrés Vargas-Jimenez, Ralf Wagner, Anwar Saab Mazzei, Willian Velazquez, Manuela Jorquera, Kita Sallabanda, Juan Antonio Barcia Albacar, Angela Carrascosa-Granada
World Neurosurgery.2023; 173: e148.     CrossRef
Clinical Outcomes and Quality of Life in Elderly Patients Treated with a Newly Designed Double Tube Endoscopy for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Lantao Liu, Jian Dong, Dechun Wang, Chao Zhang, Yue Zhou
Orthopaedic Surgery.2022; 14(7): 1359.     CrossRef
Improvement following minimally invasive lumbar decompression in patients 80 years or older compared with younger age groups
Pratyush Shahi, Junho Song, Sidhant Dalal, Dimitra Melissaridou, Daniel J. Shinn, Kasra Araghi, Eric Mai, Evan Sheha, James Dowdell, Sheeraz A. Qureshi, Sravisht Iyer
Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2022; 37(6): 828.     CrossRef
Comparison Between Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression and Other Decompression Approaches for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review
Po-Lin Chiang, Ying-Yu Chen, Ko-Ta Chen, Jason C. Hsu, Christopher Wu, Ching-Yu Lee, Tsung-Jen Huang, Yi-Hung Huang, Chien-Min Chen, Meng-Huang Wu
World Neurosurgery.2022; 168: 369.     CrossRef
Are There Differences Between Patients with Extreme Stenosis and Non-extreme Stenosis in Terms of Pain, Function or Complications After Spinal Decompression Using a Tubular Retractor System?
Arvind G. Kulkarni, Swaroop Das, Tushar S. Kunder
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research.2020; 478(2): 348.     CrossRef
Complications and limitations of tubular retractor system in minimally invasive spine surgery: A review
AmitC Jhala, SharvilC Gajjar
Indian Spine Journal.2020; 3(1): 34.     CrossRef
Feasibility and Outcomes of Tubular Decompression in Extreme Stenosis: [RETRACTED]
Arvind G. Kulkarni, Swaroop Das
Spine.2020; 45(11): E647.     CrossRef
Comparative Study Between Uniportal Full-Endoscopic Interlaminar and Tubular Approach in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Pilot Study
Angela Carrascosa-Granada, Willian Velazquez, Ralf Wagner, Anwar Saab Mazzei, Andrés Vargas-Jimenez, Manuela Jorquera, Juan Antonio Barcia Albacar, Kita Sallabanda
Global Spine Journal.2020; 10(2_suppl): 70S.     CrossRef
Efficacy of Biocage in treating single-segment lumbar degenerative disease in patients with high risk of non-fusion: a prospective controlled study with at least 2 years’ follow-up
Yang Li, Yang Yu, Tian-yong Hou, Ze-hua Zhang, Jun-chao Xing, Hong-wei Lu, Rui Zhou, Peng Cheng, Jian-Zhong Xu, Wen-jie Wu, Fei Luo
Journal of International Medical Research.2020; 48(9): 030006052094550.     CrossRef
Lumbar spine surgery in the elderly patient
Joshua Bell, Hamid Hassanzadeh
Seminars in Spine Surgery.2020; 32(4): 100830.     CrossRef
Open versus minimally invasive decompression for low-grade spondylolisthesis: analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database
Erica F. Bisson, Praveen V. Mummaneni, Michael S. Virk, John Knightly, Mohammed Ali Alvi, Anshit Goyal, Andrew K. Chan, Jian Guan, Steven Glassman, Kevin Foley, Jonathan R. Slotkin, Eric A. Potts, Mark E. Shaffrey, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Regis W. Haid,
Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2020; 33(3): 349.     CrossRef