1. Geck MJ, Eismont FJ. Surgical options for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Orthop Clin North Am 2002 33:329–348. PMID:
12389279.
2. Hirabayashi K, Bohlman HH. Multilevel cervical spondylosis. Laminoplasty versus anterior decompression. Spine 1995 20:1732–1734. PMID:
7482026.
3. Mikawa Y, Shikata J, Yamamuro T. Spinal deformity and instability after multilevel cervical laminectomy. Spine 1987 12:6–11. PMID:
3576358.
4. Kato Y, Iwasaki M, Fuji T, Yonenobu K, Ochi T. Long-term follow-up results of laminectomy for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Neurosurg 1998 89:217–223. PMID:
9688116.
5. Matsunaga S, Sakou T, Nakanisi K. Analysis of the cervical spine alignment following laminoplasty and laminectomy. Spinal Cord 1999 37:20–24. PMID:
10025690.
6. Morimoto T, Ohtsuka H, Sakaki T, Kawaguchi M. Postlaminectomy cervical spinal cord compression demonstrated by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Case report. J Neurosurg 1998 88:155–157. PMID:
9420092.
7. Shiraishi T, Fukuda K, Yato Y, Nakamura M, Ikegami T. Results of skip laminectomy-minimum 2-year follow-up study compared with open-door laminoplasty. Spine 2003 28:2667–2672. PMID:
14673367.
8. Huang RC, Girardi FP, Poynton AR, Cammisa FP Jr. Treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myeloradiculopathy with posterior decompression and fusion with lateral mass plate fixation and local bone graft. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003 16:123–129. PMID:
12679665.
9. Guigui P, Benoist M, Deburge A. Spinal deformity and instability after multilevel cervical laminectomy for spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 1998 23:440–447. PMID:
9516698.
10. Sekhon LH. Posterior cervical decompression and fusion for circumferential spondylotic cervical stenosis: review of 50 consecutive cases. J Clin Neurosci 2006 13:23–30. PMID:
16410194.
11. Heller JG, Edwards CC 2nd, Murakami H, Rodts GE. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched cohort analysis. Spine 2001 26:1330–1336. PMID:
11426147.
12. Yonenobu K, Hosono N, Iwasaki M, Asano M, Ono K. Laminoplasty versus subtotal corpectomy. A comparative study of results in multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 1992 17:1281–1284. PMID:
1462201.
13. Edwards CC 2nd, Heller JG, Murakami H. Corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched-cohort analysis. Spine 2002 27:1168–1175. PMID:
12045513.
14. Matsumoto M, Nojiri K, Chiba K, Toyama Y, Fukui Y, Kamata M. Open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy resulting from adjacent-segment disease in patients with previous anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Spine 2006 31:1332–1337. PMID:
16721295.
15. Sasai K, Saito T, Ohnari H, et al. Microsurgical posterior herniotomy with en bloc laminoplasty: alternative method for treating cervical disc herniation. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005 18:171–177. PMID:
15800436.
16. Atkinson JH, Slater MA, Williams RA, et al. A placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of nortriptyline for chronic low back pain. Pain 1998 76:287–296. PMID:
9718247.
17. Uematsu Y, Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H. Radiculopathy after laminoplasty of the cervical spine. Spine 1998 23:2057–2062. PMID:
9794049.
18. Satomi K, Nishu Y, Kohno T, Hirabayashi K. Long-term follow-up studies of open-door expansive laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine 1994 19:507–510. PMID:
8184342.
19. Hosono N, Yonenobu K, Ono K. Neck and shoulder pain after laminoplasty. A noticeable complication. Spine 1996 21:1969–1973. PMID:
8883196.
20. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Ishihara H, Gejo R, Yoshino O. Axial symptoms after en bloc cervical laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord 1999 12:392–395. PMID:
10549702.
21. Yoshida M, Tamaki T, Kawakami M, et al. Does reconstruction of posterior ligamentous complex with extensor musculature decrease axial symptoms after cervical laminoplasty? Spine 2002 27:1414–1418. PMID:
12131738.
22. Kawaguchi Y, Kanamori M, Ishiara H, Nobukiyo M, Seki S, Kimura T. Preventive measures for axial symptoms following cervical laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003 16:497–501. PMID:
14657744.
23. Wada E, Suzuki S, Kanazawa A, Matsuoka T, Miyamoto S, Yonenobu K. Subtotal corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a long-term follow-up study over 10 years. Spine 2001 26:1443–1447. PMID:
11458148.
24. Suda K, Abumi K, Ito M, Shono Y, Kaneda K, Fujiya M. Local kyphosis reduces surgical outcomes of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 2003 28:1258–1262. PMID:
12811268.
25. Kawakami M, Tamaki T, Ando M, Yamada H, Matsumoto T, Yoshida M. Preoperative instability does not influence the clinical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated with expansive laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 2002 15:277–283. PMID:
12177542.
26. Park AE, Heller JG. Cervical laminoplasty: use of a novel titanium plate to maintain canal expansion--surgical technique. J Spinal Disord Tech 2004 17:265–271. PMID:
15280753.
27. Darden BV 2nd, Hatley MK, Owen JH. Neurogenic motor evoked-potential monitoring in anterior cervical surgery. J Spinal Disord 1996 9:485–493. PMID:
8976488.
28. Gokaslan ZL, Samudrala S, Deletis V, Wildrick DM, Cooper PR. Intraoperative monitoring of spinal cord function using motor evoked potentials via transcutaneous epidural electrode during anterior cervical spinal surgery. J Spinal Disord 1997 10:299–303. PMID:
9278914.
29. Sethuraman V, Hilibrand A, Schwartz D. The utility of transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring as an indicator of impending cervical spinal cord injury In: 29th Annual Meeting of Cervical Spine Research Society 2001; Monterey, CA.
30. Yonenobu K, Yamamoto T, Ono K,Clark C,Laminoplasty for myelopathy: indications, results, outcome, and complications. editors. The cervical spine. 1998.3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; p.849–864.